A TRIZ Based Systematic Methodology in Resolving Dilemma of Environmental Policy

• Main Authors: Hsu-Hao Cheng, 鄭旭浩
• Other Authors: Luke Chen
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2006
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/58897339476525397027

博士 === 淡江大學 === 水資源及環境工程學系博士班 === 94 === To implement environmental policies, government body usually encounters dilemma of balance between environmental objectives and economic development. More difficulties may occur in environmental law enforcement, dealing with environmental protest and incomplete implementation for environmental policies.To resolve these dilemma or difficulties, related governmental authorities and organizations often treat the cases with individual approach under the individual case’s specific circumstance. There is a need to develop a systematic approach or tool to resolve the dilemma while avoiding personal preference or subjective judgment. In this study, a TRIZ based methodology to find alternatives for resolving the dilemma or difficulties was developed and eight cases study was demonstrated the procedures of the problem solving approach. In this study there are one hundred and eleven environmental related cases which Control Yuan has investigated between the years of 1985-95 are reviewed. The review concluded that there are eleven major factors causing the investigated complain cases. The eleven factors then are related with the thirty night engineering parameters in the TRIZ Contradiction Matrix by means of grey analysis and genetic evaluation approach. There are forty innovative solution principles corresponding to the non-technical TRIZ Contradiction Matrix was established. Combine the innovative principles and non-technical TRIZ Contradiction Matrix, one can applies them in the searching for alternatives in resolving environmental dilemma. The proposed resolving procedures are concluded as follows: 1.Find out the main factors which result in environmental dilemma. The factors may include the sustaining parameters (listed in the row of the Matrix), and the improving parameters (listed in the column of the Matrix). 2.Find out the innovative principles by relating the above non-technical TRIZ Contradiction Matrix with the corresponding innovative principles listed in the same element in the Innovative Principle Matrix. The found innovative principles then provide the guidelines for formulating the resolution of the environmental dilemma. 3.By means of auxiliary methods the feasibility of the resolution alternatives can be evaluated. To demonstrate the methodology, there are eight case studies was performed in this study. They are 1.An innovative way toward a river water quality control, 2.An innovative solution in resolving conflict in building industrial waste incinerators from local resident, 3.An innovative plan on promoting protection of water resources reservor, 4.An innovative plan on improving image and on enriching functions of municipal incinerators, 5.An innovative plan on releasing the tension between industry and local residences, 6.An innovative plan on the public participating in the emergency reaction to sea water pollution event, 7.An innovative plan on the assessment of compensation for soil pollution, 8.An innovative plan on reducing and reusing construction earth work. This study proposes a systematical methodology in resolving environmental dilemma. The demonstrated case studies provides alternatives for environmental policy makers and implementation organizations.