A Study on the Analysis of Competition Strategy of Taiwanese and Japanese TFT-LCD Industries

碩士 === 輔仁大學 === 科技管理學程碩士在職專班 === 95 === TFT-LCD industries are mainly centralized in East-Asian countries, including Japan, Korea, Taiwan, and following by Mainland China. TFT-LCD panel technologies in Taiwan have been studied especially from Japan. Now panel industries in Taiwan are called ‘the sec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chen Kai, 陳愷
Other Authors: 楊銘賢
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2006
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/39318471888827740765
Description
Summary:碩士 === 輔仁大學 === 科技管理學程碩士在職專班 === 95 === TFT-LCD industries are mainly centralized in East-Asian countries, including Japan, Korea, Taiwan, and following by Mainland China. TFT-LCD panel technologies in Taiwan have been studied especially from Japan. Now panel industries in Taiwan are called ‘the second semiconductor industries’. The characteristics of business cycles of those industries are very clear and the swinging ranges are different. TFT-LCD manufactures have to choice and predict what lies ahead, like the prediction of main streams of the size of applied products using those panels. In addition, they need to propose next industrial lines, down sizing of the cost, and its attractiveness to pull in excellent staffs. The capital fund to expand its productivities cost multibillion NT dollars easily. It is so highly risk that testing management abilities of each company are required. This study explored the relationship of resource-based theory and competitive advantage which influence the manufacturing strategy. It was analyzed by the case study method to conduct interviews with five companies in Taiwan and Japan. The questions were including its business styles, the relationship of resource-based theory and competitive advantage, and some related proposition. It become reference for Taiwanese panel manufactures to consider manufacturing strategies. Those related proposition were as below. 1. The TFT-LCD panel companies which posses strong core abilities can creat highly benefits for competitive advantage. 2. The companies which posses core capitals enough can create competitive advantage used by its core capitals. 3. The level of differential products directly influenced competitive advantage of the company. 4. All companies in the case study take manufacturing strategy to differentiate products under the assumption. 5. The core capital and competitive advantage were directly influenced to manufacturing strategy.