Comparative Analysis of Energy Education Content for Compulsory Education in Taiwan

• Main Authors: Chia-Wen Yu, 余佳雯
• Other Authors: Deh-Shi Hsu
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2007
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/79746591598850591437

碩士 === 立德管理學院 === 資源環境研究所 === 95 === The thesis takes Kang-Hsuan edition of teaching material and KEEP teaching material employed by Wisconsin State energy educational centre, U.S.A. as examples, and analyses the present situation and characteristic on the energy education of those two edtions of teaching materials with the comparative education studying approach addressed by G. Z. F. Bereday, to make some suggestions on the development and demand of domestic energy education and teaching materials. Via comparative analysis, the following conclusions are reached: First, Kang-Hsuan edition of teaching material develops related curriculum on energy education in grade four thereafter. However, KEEP teaching material has already designed a lot of educational course on energy before grade four. Second, the design of KEEP teaching material mainly is concentrated on energy educational objective. Nevertheless, Kang-Hsuan edition of teaching material combines energy educational objective with other discipline educational objective, and therefore is more extensive comparatively. Third, KEEP teaching material designs more intact course to the development , use and nuclear pollution of the nuclear energy, but Kang-Hsuan edition of teaching material is more insufficient comparatively in nuclear energy. Fourth, Kang-Hsuan edition of teaching material has introduced energy containing and exploitation all over the world in grade nine.Nonetheless, KEEP teaching material does not have like design, and relatively concentrates on the introduction of the energy development and exploitation of U.S.A.