A Comparison of Meta-heuristics Algorithms for Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling
碩士 === 國立交通大學 === 工業工程與管理系所 === 95 === Resource-constrained project scheduling is a NP-hard problem. In the last few decades, several meta-heuristics algorithms have been proposed to solve the problem. The algorithm proposed by Debels et al. (2006) is by far the most leading one. To develop a better...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
2007
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/99638941796910735221 |
id |
ndltd-TW-095NCTU5031062 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-095NCTU50310622015-10-13T16:13:48Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/99638941796910735221 A Comparison of Meta-heuristics Algorithms for Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling 有限資源專案排程之巨集啟發式演算法的比較 Fu-Teng Shi 施富騰 碩士 國立交通大學 工業工程與管理系所 95 Resource-constrained project scheduling is a NP-hard problem. In the last few decades, several meta-heuristics algorithms have been proposed to solve the problem. The algorithm proposed by Debels et al. (2006) is by far the most leading one. To develop a better algorithm, we applied the notions of consensus and Taguchi genetic operators and proposed various meta-heuristics algorithms. Extensive numerical tests have been carried out. These tests include 1560 problem instances, which are categorized into 9 scenarios. Compared with the algorithm proposed by Debels et al. (2006), our algorithm excel in 22% scenarios, has a tie in 22% scenarios, and lose in 56% scenarios. Muh-Cherng Wu 巫木誠 2007 學位論文 ; thesis 63 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 國立交通大學 === 工業工程與管理系所 === 95 === Resource-constrained project scheduling is a NP-hard problem. In the last few decades, several meta-heuristics algorithms have been proposed to solve the problem. The algorithm proposed by Debels et al. (2006) is by far the most leading one. To develop a better algorithm, we applied the notions of consensus and Taguchi genetic operators and proposed various meta-heuristics algorithms. Extensive numerical tests have been carried out. These tests include 1560 problem instances, which are categorized into 9 scenarios. Compared with the algorithm proposed by Debels et al. (2006), our algorithm excel in 22% scenarios, has a tie in 22% scenarios, and lose in 56% scenarios.
|
author2 |
Muh-Cherng Wu |
author_facet |
Muh-Cherng Wu Fu-Teng Shi 施富騰 |
author |
Fu-Teng Shi 施富騰 |
spellingShingle |
Fu-Teng Shi 施富騰 A Comparison of Meta-heuristics Algorithms for Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling |
author_sort |
Fu-Teng Shi |
title |
A Comparison of Meta-heuristics Algorithms for Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling |
title_short |
A Comparison of Meta-heuristics Algorithms for Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling |
title_full |
A Comparison of Meta-heuristics Algorithms for Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling |
title_fullStr |
A Comparison of Meta-heuristics Algorithms for Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Comparison of Meta-heuristics Algorithms for Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling |
title_sort |
comparison of meta-heuristics algorithms for resource-constrained project scheduling |
publishDate |
2007 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/99638941796910735221 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT futengshi acomparisonofmetaheuristicsalgorithmsforresourceconstrainedprojectscheduling AT shīfùténg acomparisonofmetaheuristicsalgorithmsforresourceconstrainedprojectscheduling AT futengshi yǒuxiànzīyuánzhuānànpáichéngzhījùjíqǐfāshìyǎnsuànfǎdebǐjiào AT shīfùténg yǒuxiànzīyuánzhuānànpáichéngzhījùjíqǐfāshìyǎnsuànfǎdebǐjiào AT futengshi comparisonofmetaheuristicsalgorithmsforresourceconstrainedprojectscheduling AT shīfùténg comparisonofmetaheuristicsalgorithmsforresourceconstrainedprojectscheduling |
_version_ |
1717770002176671744 |