Innovation System and Policy for Taiwan's IC Design Service Industry

碩士 === 國立交通大學 === 科技管理研究所 === 95 === This study provides an integrated model of innovation intensive services (IIS) and industrial innovation systems, which include both industry-level and national-level approaches to depict the future suggestion for applying policy instruments. A case study of Taiw...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: 蔡明娟
Other Authors: 徐作聖
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2007
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/43076553266425655812
Description
Summary:碩士 === 國立交通大學 === 科技管理研究所 === 95 === This study provides an integrated model of innovation intensive services (IIS) and industrial innovation systems, which include both industry-level and national-level approaches to depict the future suggestion for applying policy instruments. A case study of Taiwan’s IC design service industry is used in this research to demonstrate the validity of this analytical model. The model respectively dissects four influential factors of industrial environments and technological systems at the industry-level analysis to verify the requirements of industrial innovation system, thereby constructing an industry-level analytical framework for developing IIS industry. Next, the result of national-level analysis will be obtained by the correlation between three levels of policy instruments (including supply, demand, and environmental side policies) and the above-mentioned requirements of industrial environments and technological systems in terms of the perspective of IIS approach. Results of case study in Taiwan’s IC design service industry reveal that the current critical factors of industrial innovation system in industry level include factor conditions, receiver competence, connectivity, and variety creation mechanism. In addition, the requirements of industrial innovation systems, including firm strategy, structure, rivalry and connectivity, could be emphasized for the future development of IC design service industry. The research also indicates that some policy instruments in national-level are essential for Taiwan’s IC design service industry such as scientific and technical investment, political measures, education and training, legal and regulation, and information. This research suggests that our government and related institutions should put more resources into the above mentioned policy instruments to enhance the competitiveness of Taiwan’s IC design services.