| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立中山大學 === 政治學研究所 === 95 === The method of my thesis is "historical document analysis" whose major line is dependency theory of Marxism which I will pick up famous scholar''s books or journals within. Dependency theory of Marxism consists of underdevelopment school and dependent development school. The former has A. G. Frank, T. Dos Santos and Samir Amin etc.. The latter has F. H. Cardoso, E. Faletto, Peter B. Evans, J. A Caporaso and R. H. Chilcote etc.. Dependency theory of Structuralism which is a complement to dependency theory of Marxism has Raúl Prebisch, Celso Furtado and Osvaldo Sunkel.
As to state development''s research of dependency theory, it includes three parts: origins, schools and prospection. First part is origins. The academic thinking of dependency theory which is one of theories about researches of colonialism and imperialism in the 1960s follows Marxism''s foundation──i.e. productivity and productive relations. Though, dependency theory on the sphere of international relation belongs to a pan-Marxism family──as is neo-Marxism. However, Marx himself also ever declared that he wasn''t a Marxist, namely, that researchers who follow Marx only take a part of Marx''s intelligence, not all──even distort that. So, the first step to understand economic asymmetry relations between peripheral and central state is back to the tradition of classical Marxism──namely, Marx''s, Lenin''s and Engel''s intelligence──and searches origins of dependency theory about peripherial state.
Second part is schools which follow so-called "Two Stages" of Classical dependency and Dependent development theory. In first stage, it will begin to analyse United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America (ECLA) school''s views and turns to underdevelopment school''s views. From this kind of analysis, we can understand underdevelopment school''s critique of ECLA school and innovation. For these management, the thesis will be written with "inside" and "outside" relations. Before that, I will elaborate illumination of P. Baran, P. Sweezy and Prebisch on Frank''s peripheral state. In second one, the thesis begines with Cardoso''s, Faletto''s, Caporaso''s and Chilcote''s views about historical-structural approach in order to emphasize methodical changes from Classical dependency theory to Dependent development theory, and show state''s development problems affected by inner classes and transnational companies with Evans'' "triple alliance".
The last part is prospection. Dependency theory gets rise from 1950s. As time goes by, the methodology of dependency theory doesn''t satisfy with academic researches in the age of globalization. So the thesis will dig out the value which is that dependency theory can countine to criticize the unfair structure of capitalism in the age of globalization from new researches of dependency theory''s scholars which include dependency theory of Marxism and Structuralism.
|
|---|
