Question Analysis and Answer Passages Retrieval for Opinion Question Answering Systems

碩士 === 國立臺灣大學 === 資訊工程學研究所 === 95 === Question answering (QA) systems provide an elegant way for people to access an underlying knowledge base. Humans are not only interested in factual questions but also interested in opinions. In this thesis, an opinion QA system dealing with opinion questions...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yu-Ting Liang, 梁玉婷
Other Authors: Hsin-Hsi Chen
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: 2007
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/51602609622807989234
id ndltd-TW-095NTU05392011
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-095NTU053920112015-12-11T04:04:49Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/51602609622807989234 Question Analysis and Answer Passages Retrieval for Opinion Question Answering Systems 意見問答系統中問題分析與答案區段選取之研究 Yu-Ting Liang 梁玉婷 碩士 國立臺灣大學 資訊工程學研究所 95 Question answering (QA) systems provide an elegant way for people to access an underlying knowledge base. Humans are not only interested in factual questions but also interested in opinions. In this thesis, an opinion QA system dealing with opinion questions are proposed. We attempt to investigate technologies of question analysis and answer passages retrieval. For question analysis, six opinion question types are defined. A two-layered framework utilizing two question type classifiers is proposed. Algorithms for these two classifiers are discussed. The performance achieves 87.8% in general question classification and 92.5% in opinion question classification. The question’s focus and polarity are detected as well to form an IR query and sieve out relevant sentences which have the same polarity to the question. For answer passages retrieval, three components are introduced. Relevant sentences retrieved by the IR system are further identified whether the focus (Focus Scope Identification) is in a scope of opinion text spans (Opinion Scope Identification) or not, and if yes, whether the polarity of the scope matches with the polarity of the question (Polarity Detection). A total of 18 combinations are proposed and experimented. The best model achieves 40.59% of F-measure using partial match at boundary level. With relevance issues removed, the F-measure of the best model boosts up to 87.18%. We further divide the experiment results by topics. The results indicate difficulties of different topics. We conclude with some yet unsolvable but quite interesting problems to study in the future to build a complete opinion QA system. Hsin-Hsi Chen 陳信希 2007 學位論文 ; thesis 113 en_US
collection NDLTD
language en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立臺灣大學 === 資訊工程學研究所 === 95 === Question answering (QA) systems provide an elegant way for people to access an underlying knowledge base. Humans are not only interested in factual questions but also interested in opinions. In this thesis, an opinion QA system dealing with opinion questions are proposed. We attempt to investigate technologies of question analysis and answer passages retrieval. For question analysis, six opinion question types are defined. A two-layered framework utilizing two question type classifiers is proposed. Algorithms for these two classifiers are discussed. The performance achieves 87.8% in general question classification and 92.5% in opinion question classification. The question’s focus and polarity are detected as well to form an IR query and sieve out relevant sentences which have the same polarity to the question. For answer passages retrieval, three components are introduced. Relevant sentences retrieved by the IR system are further identified whether the focus (Focus Scope Identification) is in a scope of opinion text spans (Opinion Scope Identification) or not, and if yes, whether the polarity of the scope matches with the polarity of the question (Polarity Detection). A total of 18 combinations are proposed and experimented. The best model achieves 40.59% of F-measure using partial match at boundary level. With relevance issues removed, the F-measure of the best model boosts up to 87.18%. We further divide the experiment results by topics. The results indicate difficulties of different topics. We conclude with some yet unsolvable but quite interesting problems to study in the future to build a complete opinion QA system.
author2 Hsin-Hsi Chen
author_facet Hsin-Hsi Chen
Yu-Ting Liang
梁玉婷
author Yu-Ting Liang
梁玉婷
spellingShingle Yu-Ting Liang
梁玉婷
Question Analysis and Answer Passages Retrieval for Opinion Question Answering Systems
author_sort Yu-Ting Liang
title Question Analysis and Answer Passages Retrieval for Opinion Question Answering Systems
title_short Question Analysis and Answer Passages Retrieval for Opinion Question Answering Systems
title_full Question Analysis and Answer Passages Retrieval for Opinion Question Answering Systems
title_fullStr Question Analysis and Answer Passages Retrieval for Opinion Question Answering Systems
title_full_unstemmed Question Analysis and Answer Passages Retrieval for Opinion Question Answering Systems
title_sort question analysis and answer passages retrieval for opinion question answering systems
publishDate 2007
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/51602609622807989234
work_keys_str_mv AT yutingliang questionanalysisandanswerpassagesretrievalforopinionquestionansweringsystems
AT liángyùtíng questionanalysisandanswerpassagesretrievalforopinionquestionansweringsystems
AT yutingliang yìjiànwèndáxìtǒngzhōngwèntífēnxīyǔdáànqūduànxuǎnqǔzhīyánjiū
AT liángyùtíng yìjiànwèndáxìtǒngzhōngwèntífēnxīyǔdáànqūduànxuǎnqǔzhīyánjiū
_version_ 1718148468272267264