Operation Models of Non-Formal Community Art Education – a Case Study of the Dream Community Culture & Education Develop Foundation and Fanglin Community Center

碩士 === 中原大學 === 室內設計研究所 === 96 === This study explores how the Dream Community Culture & Education Develop Foundation realized “Dream Parade” the street parades and workshops focused on artistic creation. Through both the process of the project’s execution and the participation of the Chung yuan...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: GENGLI-LI LIN, 林耿立
Other Authors: BOULIN HU
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2008
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/64739904882784419068
Description
Summary:碩士 === 中原大學 === 室內設計研究所 === 96 === This study explores how the Dream Community Culture & Education Develop Foundation realized “Dream Parade” the street parades and workshops focused on artistic creation. Through both the process of the project’s execution and the participation of the Chung yuan Fanglin Community Center, the study also seeks to analyze and discuss the various operation models of non-formal arts education executed within the framework of community art education. Since the author of this research has participated three years of the dream parade project, following relevant theoretical discourse and interviews on the subject, the conclusions reached in regards to both the foundation and to the participating Fanling Community Center are as follows: 1. The operational models employed by the foundation in realizing its non-formal program can be classified as: (1) The efficient and flexible use of personnel (2) Self-funding, with an emphasis on integrating community resources (3)Utilizing the school as primary contact window and the community as basic unit (4)A complete, holistic process spanning teaching, creating, executing, and conclusion 2. The value of the foundation’s non-formal arts education include its: (1)Equal emphasis on multiple cultures (2)Pro-active attitude towards learning (3)Fluid teacher and student roles (4)All-encompassing learning of life (5)Emphasis on the process over the result 3. The influence and imprint of the program on its participants include: (1)The debunking of stereotypical impressions of art (2)An increase in the ability to both observe and appreciate (3)The coalescing of community and family (4)The development of physical potentials (5)An increase in self-confidence and courage (6)An identification with local culture and pride 4. Factors in the program’s success: (1)Spatial supports (2)Specific targeted groups (3)Successful friendly leaders (4)Personal character of team members (5)Participants with wide-ranging backgrounds (6)A chance to interact and engage in dialogue 5. Problems facing the program include: (1)Conflict between its educational and performance natures (2)Inability to balance breadth and depth of educational efford (3)Uneven educational experience on the parts of the guides (4)lack of conference or formal discussion between foreign culture and local culture (5)Existing misconceptions of a multi-cultural carnival (6)Consideration in regards to the true core values of the event in the form of parade