A Study of Government Workers’Recognition of the Performance Evaluation Structure with Balanced Scorecards-Evidence from a Branch of the Bureau of National Health Insurance

碩士 === 中原大學 === 會計研究所 === 96 === Abstract This study focus on the point of view of the Balanced Scorecard to discuss the employees awareness on the statue of current performance and evaluation system; and it also expect to develop the balanced scorecard at the view of employee in order to input the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: LING-AI LEE, 李令愛
Other Authors: fox Chen
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2008
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/51456549274281406736
Description
Summary:碩士 === 中原大學 === 會計研究所 === 96 === Abstract This study focus on the point of view of the Balanced Scorecard to discuss the employees awareness on the statue of current performance and evaluation system; and it also expect to develop the balanced scorecard at the view of employee in order to input the performance measurements indicators from four sides of dimensions which includes financial, customer (insurance object), internal business processes, learning and growth. It will also provide the reference of evaluation to the institutions administration and establish a reference of the indicator for measurable performance, The results showed that: First, the current status of performance and evaluation system for the case of organization -This study found that the organization’s employee widely known the organizations have a formal performance evaluation system which is used to improve the performance, and also knows the system of evaluation work is done by each unit who take responsibility under the power. When an organization develop the object of performance, the most important consideration is based on the "be able combination with the objectives and strategies of institutions." If use the test-score developed by the Department of Health, the employee will consider the most important item of test-score is "protection and care for disability groups ". If use the professionalism of indicators, the employee is most concern the item of “customer satisfaction "; on the contrary, the lesser concern is the " image and honor (such as awards…) " In addition, based on the current implementing status of test-score, the staff considers the test-score can be used as reference for future goals. Second, under the dimension of the Balanced Scorecard, at the views of employee select the performance measurements indicator -This study concluded and collated the performance measurements indicators from the government Offices after reference all related documents. Through out a questionnaire and important analysis that elected the most important five indicators of each dimensions from the four dimensions of Balanced Scorecard, as reference for the case organizations and other government offices (civil servants Authorities) set indicators to measure the performance. The financial dimensions include : 「funding, effective use of resources」,「achievement of institution, item of evaluation」, 「budget for proper control」and 「productivity」, 「distribution of resources」; the customers dimensions include : 「Conservative, confidential」,「Quality of Service (current, incurrent…) 」 and 「service attitude (Courtesy) 」, 「honest and ability」「, ensure the quality of medical care」; the internal processes dimensions include: 「Process Improvement」, 「Quality and accuracy」, 「execution the ISO or standard operating (information security) 」,「service time」 and 「ensure the quality of medical care activities」; the learning and growth dimensions include: 「 Improvement the system processes」, 「immediate and correct control the customer information and ability from client 」 ,「 encourage and reward system」,「establishment the information exchange with the outside environment 」, 「internal management and leadership」. Third, analysis any factors of the performance measurement indicators - Through the factor analytical method, it classified one to two various factors from the each dimension of the indicators. Each characteristic value of factor is greater than one, and also all the cumulative variant values of interpretation are greater than 63.365 percent. Therefore, this study has the following desirable result. Under financial dimension, it reaches a factor of budget. Under the customer dimension, it reaches two factors which increases customers’ satisfaction and cooperate with the task from the master organization. Under internal processes dimensions, it controls the factor of internal procedure. Under learning and growth dimensions, it reach one factor which strengthens the core of employee’s capacity and skill.