Green Supply Chain Management, Institutional Pressure, and Organizational Performance-An Investigation of Taiwanese Manufacturing Industries

碩士 === 國立高雄應用科技大學 === 商務經營研究所 === 96 === Due to the boost of eco-awareness, the environmental protection laws are getting stricter. There are a number of laws related to this field and are being set internationally, such as the WEEE and RoHS in Europe. Thus, the environmental issues have caused the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jian-Feng Lan, 藍健峰
Other Authors: Liang-Hung Lin
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2008
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/66222757501599529346
Description
Summary:碩士 === 國立高雄應用科技大學 === 商務經營研究所 === 96 === Due to the boost of eco-awareness, the environmental protection laws are getting stricter. There are a number of laws related to this field and are being set internationally, such as the WEEE and RoHS in Europe. Thus, the environmental issues have caused the significant effects in supply chain management. Nowadays, the enterprises not only ask their suppliers to provide the eco-products, but also request themselves to build up environmental management systems to respond to pressures resulted from governmental regulation. The definitions of green supply chain in enterprises are extensive, and the researches on environmental pressures about how to impact the practices of GSCM in Taiwanese enterprise are much less. Based on the explanation above, this study tries to examine how institutional and stakeholders pressures affect the practices of Green Supply Chain Management (GSCM), and further discusses the relationship between the practices of GSCM and environmental performance.This study collected sample of 104 firms Taiwanese electronics, chemical and auto components industries, and founds that: 1. The regulative institution, internal and external stakeholders have significantly positive effects on external GSCM practice. 2. The normative institutional pressure has significantly positive effect on investment recovery. 3. The normative, cognitive institutional pressure and external stakeholders have significantly positive effects on internal environmental management. 4. The investment recovery, eco-design and internal environmental management have significantly positive effects on environmental performance.