The Network mechanism of scholarly productivity in Taiwan sociology: An Example of citation networks of sociological academic journals in 2001~2006
碩士 === 國立政治大學 === 社會學研究所 === 96 === Abstract In recent years, as the world has been trending toward a Knowledge-based Economy, governments worldwide have recognized the importance of academic research, providing resources to upgrade the academic research level in order to internationalize scholarly...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
2008
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/62892709748916665131 |
id |
ndltd-TW-096NCCU5208012 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-096NCCU52080122015-10-13T13:47:33Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/62892709748916665131 The Network mechanism of scholarly productivity in Taiwan sociology: An Example of citation networks of sociological academic journals in 2001~2006 台灣社會學門的知識生產網絡機制:以2001~2006年社會學門學術期刊引用網絡為例 Ko, Pei Chun 柯佩均 碩士 國立政治大學 社會學研究所 96 Abstract In recent years, as the world has been trending toward a Knowledge-based Economy, governments worldwide have recognized the importance of academic research, providing resources to upgrade the academic research level in order to internationalize scholarly pursuit. Taiwan, as a latecomer to the concept of Knowledge-based Economy, has begun to constitute science and social science rules and evaluations for academic development. The study intends to capture the transformation of the academic field by examining citations. In early works in the science of sociology, citation was an important indication of scholarly productivity. Social network analysis (SNA) enriches the methodology, and makes the indication to the idea of citation networks. Based on the perspective of SNA, the study investigates the citation network database of sociological journals between 2001 and 2006, and the concurrent citation networks of sociologists from three prior sociological journals. The results include three parts: first, the structure of journals' citation networks shows the trend of centralization, and two academic journals attain privileged status by means of structural equivalence. Second, the dual network of authors and journals demonstrate the citation divisions of sociologists and social workers. The sociological professional journals and social worker professional journals also are divided by time. Finally, the citation mechanism of sociologists verifies the normative pattern. In conclusion, the analysis confirms the impact of social science policy, which influences the centralization of citation networks and the advantageous status of specific sociological journals. The sociologists' citation networks are related to the specialty similarities of scholars, not the social relations. The study gives a pioneer explanation of citation networks of Taiwanese sociology. 熊瑞梅 2008 學位論文 ; thesis 110 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 國立政治大學 === 社會學研究所 === 96 === Abstract
In recent years, as the world has been trending toward a Knowledge-based Economy, governments worldwide have recognized the importance of academic research, providing resources to upgrade the academic research level in order to internationalize scholarly pursuit. Taiwan, as a latecomer to the concept of Knowledge-based Economy, has begun to constitute science and social science rules and evaluations for academic development.
The study intends to capture the transformation of the academic field by examining citations. In early works in the science of sociology, citation was an important indication of scholarly productivity. Social network analysis (SNA) enriches the methodology, and makes the indication to the idea of citation networks. Based on the perspective of SNA, the study investigates the citation network database of sociological journals between 2001 and 2006, and the concurrent citation networks of sociologists from three prior sociological journals.
The results include three parts: first, the structure of journals' citation networks shows the trend of centralization, and two academic journals attain privileged status by means of structural equivalence. Second, the dual network of authors and journals demonstrate the citation divisions of sociologists and social workers. The sociological professional journals and social worker professional journals also are divided by time. Finally, the citation mechanism of sociologists verifies the normative pattern. In conclusion, the analysis confirms the impact of social science policy, which influences the centralization of citation networks and the advantageous status of specific sociological journals. The sociologists' citation networks are related to the specialty similarities of scholars, not the social relations. The study gives a pioneer explanation of citation networks of Taiwanese sociology.
|
author2 |
熊瑞梅 |
author_facet |
熊瑞梅 Ko, Pei Chun 柯佩均 |
author |
Ko, Pei Chun 柯佩均 |
spellingShingle |
Ko, Pei Chun 柯佩均 The Network mechanism of scholarly productivity in Taiwan sociology: An Example of citation networks of sociological academic journals in 2001~2006 |
author_sort |
Ko, Pei Chun |
title |
The Network mechanism of scholarly productivity in Taiwan sociology: An Example of citation networks of sociological academic journals in 2001~2006 |
title_short |
The Network mechanism of scholarly productivity in Taiwan sociology: An Example of citation networks of sociological academic journals in 2001~2006 |
title_full |
The Network mechanism of scholarly productivity in Taiwan sociology: An Example of citation networks of sociological academic journals in 2001~2006 |
title_fullStr |
The Network mechanism of scholarly productivity in Taiwan sociology: An Example of citation networks of sociological academic journals in 2001~2006 |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Network mechanism of scholarly productivity in Taiwan sociology: An Example of citation networks of sociological academic journals in 2001~2006 |
title_sort |
network mechanism of scholarly productivity in taiwan sociology: an example of citation networks of sociological academic journals in 2001~2006 |
publishDate |
2008 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/62892709748916665131 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kopeichun thenetworkmechanismofscholarlyproductivityintaiwansociologyanexampleofcitationnetworksofsociologicalacademicjournalsin20012006 AT kēpèijūn thenetworkmechanismofscholarlyproductivityintaiwansociologyanexampleofcitationnetworksofsociologicalacademicjournalsin20012006 AT kopeichun táiwānshèhuìxuéméndezhīshíshēngchǎnwǎngluòjīzhìyǐ20012006niánshèhuìxuéménxuéshùqīkānyǐnyòngwǎngluòwèilì AT kēpèijūn táiwānshèhuìxuéméndezhīshíshēngchǎnwǎngluòjīzhìyǐ20012006niánshèhuìxuéménxuéshùqīkānyǐnyòngwǎngluòwèilì AT kopeichun networkmechanismofscholarlyproductivityintaiwansociologyanexampleofcitationnetworksofsociologicalacademicjournalsin20012006 AT kēpèijūn networkmechanismofscholarlyproductivityintaiwansociologyanexampleofcitationnetworksofsociologicalacademicjournalsin20012006 |
_version_ |
1717741736803958784 |