A Forecast Study of the Adminstrative Corporation of National Universities Impact on National Chi Nan University

• Main Authors: Ts'eng Chien Ying, 曾建穎
• Other Authors: Chao Ta Yu
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2008
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/39944907437399874423

碩士 === 國立暨南國際大學 === 公共行政與政策學系 === 96 === Abstract Higher education is to cultivate more elitists and to increase nation’s competitiveness. The government used to play an important role in this important regard. However, university system has substantially changed since 70s due to many countries faced financial problem. One way out for university is to corporatize. Taiwan is no exception , our national universities have to reform through corporatization. This paper is a case study mainly focused on National Chi Nan University (NCNU). We analyze and forecast the budget, personnel and organization issues will be faced by NCNU if corporatization is in effect. The result is meant to apply to other national universities alike. Therefore, the literature review method is used to lay out research foundation. It guides how the case study should be conducted, and in depth interview is performed to enlarge and highlight the views and problem . The findings are as follows 1) Based on NCNU’s current condition, its abilities to corporatize is deficient. 2) The dual personnel system caused by corporatization will be a problem in university operation. 3) The responsibility among the board of directors, university and the responsible authority (Ministry of Education) is hard to divide and identify. After hard study, we suggest: 1) In order to let the national universities to adjust and become mature from corporatization .Ministry of Education might promise not to cut down subsidy within some certain years. 2) Favorable retirement arrangement should be performed to reduce the number of government employees in the university and to mitigate the problem of dual personnel system to. 3) The Ministry of Education should identify the relation and responsibility between the board of directors and the administrative meeting of the university. Whether the board of directors plays the role of monitor mechanism or decision unit should be clarified. Any reform needs to work out different aspects and details, therefore it takes time. In order to improve the quality of teaching, research and operation of national university, we hope the responsible authority can also pay attention to the differences among universities at the same time when the corporatization to be launched. ,