The Construction and Verification of a Teacher Evaluation Model for Senior High School

• Main Authors: Yang, Bao-Chin, 楊寶琴
• Other Authors: Chao, Chih-Yang
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2008
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/98141782851376415521

博士 === 國立彰化師範大學 === 工業教育與技術學系 === 96 === The purpose of the study was to construct and verify a teacher evaluation model for senior high school. Firstly, the teacher evaluation documents were collected and reviewed. According to these results, a prototype model was established and will be verified. A survey by questionnaire for teachers of senior high school was conducted and Delphi technique was utilized from experts who majored in the teacher evaluation. In addition, four evaluation tools were also constructed within the model. Finally, the following conclusions were analyzed and drawn: 1.The teacher evaluation standard system of senior high school was composed of 3 levels, including area, criteria and indicator. 2.About the area , it was composed 4 components, such as the subject ability. 3.About the criteria, it was composed of 15 items, such as the ability and presentation of the specific subjects. 4.About the indicators, it was composed of 75 indicators, such as the skillful ability of the teacher major. 5.About the area, the most important items were loyalty and attitude of a teacher, instructive ability, subject ability, and the professional development. 6.About the criteria, the most important item was to express their passion in teaching. 7.About the indicator, the most important item was whether they were skillfully in teaching their major subjects. 8.The purpose of the teacher evaluation was to provide information for auto-criticism and self-evaluation in school teaching. 9.The result of teacher evaluation should inform every teacher individually with paper report. This result should be reserved for teacher himself/herself only. 10.The teacher evaluation system should focus on self-evaluation, group evaluation, and peer evaluation. 11.The most proper way to understand teacher instruction was to observe directly in the classroom. 12.The most recommended evaluator was the teacher who taught the same subject in the same school. 13.The evaluator should have good quality and passion in school teaching. 14.For the model of teacher evaluation, the school should offer sufficient support in every step, such as committing the legal authority. 15.About the tools for teacher evaluation, it was composed of self-evaluation table, classroom-scouting table, teaching-satisfaction table and over-all-evaluation table.