| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立彰化師範大學 === 工業教育與技術學系 === 96 === The purpose of this study was to investigate the adequacy on the practice situation of the wood pattern Class B technician skill testing specification in Taiwan, ROC, and to be the contributing reference for the future revision of this specification. This study started from collection of relevant literature to establish the theorems, and then utilized survey research method to collect actual opinions on the adequacy of the wood pattern B-level skill certificate testing specification from employees in mechanical industries. Data were arranged and organized before being analyzed by descriptive analysis, T-test analysis, one-way ANOVA analysis. The final conclusions and suggestions of this study were made from the above statistic results and literature investigations.
The conclusions of this study were as follows:
1. In the wood pattern Class B technician skill testing specification, the average using frequency of skills was less than 2.0. Six of them belonged to less using skills, including “intersection and developing drawing”, “Radial arm saw”, “Wood lathe”, "fabrication of Sweeping patterns", "fabrication of Framed sweep patterns" and “first aid”.
2. In the wood pattern Class B technician skill testing specification, the importance of "Radial arm saw" and "Wood Lathe" was slightly low.
3. In the wood pattern Class B technician skill testing specification, the adequacy of "fabrication of Composited patterns" and "security and health protection" was the most adequate.
4. There were noticeably different opinions between the respondents and the proposition members and referees of the wood pattern Class B technician skill testing specification. The mechanical industrial employees considered some of the skill items were not adequate for them.
5. There were noticeably different opinions about the wood pattern Class B technician skill testing specification among the employees with different academic backgrounds. The respondents attained associate degrees considered the adequacy of the specification to be more adequate.
6. There were noticeably different opinions about the wood pattern Class B skill technician testing specification among the employees with different service seniority. The respondents with more than 16 years seniority considered the adequacy of the specification to be more adequate.
7. There were noticeably different opinions about the skill items of the wood pattern Class B technician skill testing specification among the employees with different positions except for "line drawing", " Circular sawing machine " and " Jointer ".
8. There were noticeably different opinions about the skill items of the wood pattern Class B technician skill testing specification among the employees whose companies had different scales of employees. The respondents with 20 persons in the company considered the adequacy of the specification to be more adequate.
9. There were noticeably different opinions about the skill items of the wood pattern Class B technician skill testing specification among the employees whose companies with different scales of capital. The respondents with less capital in the company considered the adequacy of "line drawing", " Wood Lathe " and " fabrication of Composited pattern " to be more adequate.
10. There were noticeably different opinions about the wood pattern Class B technician skill testing specification among the employees with different occupations. The respondents in wood pattern manufacturers considered the adequacy of the specification to be more adequate.
There are some suggestions in this study.
Keywords：skill tests,wood pattern skill, technician skill testing specification, adequacy
|
|---|
