高雄市國小高年級學童父親父職覺知與父職實踐關係之研究
碩士 === 國立高雄師範大學 === 教育學系 === 96 === Abstract This paper, by looking at elementary school students’ family of origin, is to investigate the factorial relationships among Fatherhood Conduct, Self-Fatherhood Awareness and Self-Fatherhood Conduct. The pivotal purpose of this research is fourfold: Fi...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/95718049882957417827 |
id |
ndltd-TW-096NKNU5332064 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-096NKNU53320642016-11-10T16:04:31Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/95718049882957417827 高雄市國小高年級學童父親父職覺知與父職實踐關係之研究 江怡文 碩士 國立高雄師範大學 教育學系 96 Abstract This paper, by looking at elementary school students’ family of origin, is to investigate the factorial relationships among Fatherhood Conduct, Self-Fatherhood Awareness and Self-Fatherhood Conduct. The pivotal purpose of this research is fourfold: First, it is trying to gain an insight into the up-to-date status of fatherhood awareness and conduct of the students’ fathers from Kaohsiung City. Second, by taking individual background variance into consideration, it researches into what difference and the relationship could be inferred inside the family-of-origin fatherhood conduct factor as a result of the fathers’ fatherhood awareness. Third, it, by taking individual background variance into consideration, researches into what could be the difference and the relationship inside the family-of-origin fatherhood conduct and self-fatherhood awareness factors in light of their self-fatherhood conduct. Last, this study is attempting to have a good understanding of the predictability of the family-of-origin fatherhood conduct, self-fatherhood awareness and self-fatherhood conduct. Questionnaires were given to survey the students’ fathers from both the public and private schools of Kaohsiung City. The stratified random sampling method was employed for the study purpose. Totally, 1070 fathers from 27 different schools were sampled. Surveying data were collected, processed, tested, analyzed and hypothesized using the following statistic measures: Factor Analysis , Reliability Analysis, Descriptive Statistics, t-test, One-way ANOVA, Pearson's Product-Moment Correlation and Stepwise multiple regression. Eight hypotheses were tested and discussed. The findings are as follows: 1. The fifth and sixth graders’ fathers score high on the fatherhood awareness scale with the highest score falling on the Modeling factor; the lowest is on Family Support. Their fatherhood conduct score is above average with the highest score falling on the Modeling factor, the lowest on Caring. 2. The fathers were better on fatherhood awareness than their conduct, with the widest gap being on the Caring factor, Family Support being the narrowest. 3. The fathers themselves were better on fatherhood conduct than family-of-origin fatherhood conduct, with the biggest difference sitting on the Ability Nurturing and Caring levels, Family Support being the smallest. 4. The fathers who were satisfied with their marriage, having received higher education and engaging more weekly parent-child interactions score higher on Fatherhood Awareness. 5. The fathers who were under 45 of age, satisfied with their marriage, having received higher education, engaging more weekly parent-child interactions, spending more time, primarily, on kinetic parent-child communications than, secondarily, on extension learning score higher on Fatherhood Awareness. 6. The students’ fathers who score high on family-of-origin fatherhood conduct also score high on fatherhood awareness and conduct. On top of that, the better they do on the family-of-origin fatherhood conduct level, the higher they score on modern father’s fatherhood awareness and conduct. 7. These fathers who score high on fatherhood awareness also score high on fatherhood conduct, and the better they do on awareness, the better they score on the conduct. 8. A reliable predictability on self-fatherhood conduct is hence concluded here by looking at the fifth and sixth graders’ fathers’ awareness and family-of-origin conduct, with the most reliable predictive factors falling on the Living and the Caring factor on the part of the fatherhood awareness scale, and also on the Support factor on the part of the family-of-origin fatherhood conduct scale. Accordingly, the researcher has since offered in this paper some concrete tips and suggestions to modern parents, educational institutions, business owners and future researches. 魏慧美 學位論文 ; thesis 228 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 國立高雄師範大學 === 教育學系 === 96 === Abstract
This paper, by looking at elementary school students’ family of origin, is to investigate the factorial relationships among Fatherhood Conduct, Self-Fatherhood Awareness and Self-Fatherhood Conduct. The pivotal purpose of this research is fourfold: First, it is trying to gain an insight into the up-to-date status of fatherhood awareness and conduct of the students’ fathers from Kaohsiung City. Second, by taking individual background variance into consideration, it researches into what difference and the relationship could be inferred inside the family-of-origin fatherhood conduct factor as a result of the fathers’ fatherhood awareness. Third, it, by taking individual background variance into consideration, researches into what could be the difference and the relationship inside the family-of-origin fatherhood conduct and self-fatherhood awareness factors in light of their self-fatherhood conduct. Last, this study is attempting to have a good understanding of the predictability of the family-of-origin fatherhood conduct, self-fatherhood awareness and self-fatherhood conduct.
Questionnaires were given to survey the students’ fathers from both the public and private schools of Kaohsiung City. The stratified random sampling method was employed for the study purpose. Totally, 1070 fathers from 27 different schools were sampled. Surveying data were collected, processed, tested, analyzed and hypothesized using the following statistic measures: Factor Analysis , Reliability Analysis, Descriptive Statistics, t-test, One-way ANOVA, Pearson's Product-Moment Correlation and Stepwise multiple regression. Eight hypotheses were tested and discussed. The findings are as follows:
1. The fifth and sixth graders’ fathers score high on the fatherhood awareness scale with the highest score falling on the Modeling factor; the lowest is on Family Support. Their fatherhood conduct score is above average with the highest score falling on the Modeling factor, the lowest on Caring.
2. The fathers were better on fatherhood awareness than their conduct, with the widest gap being on the Caring factor, Family Support being the narrowest.
3. The fathers themselves were better on fatherhood conduct than family-of-origin fatherhood conduct, with the biggest difference sitting on the Ability Nurturing and Caring levels, Family Support being the smallest.
4. The fathers who were satisfied with their marriage, having received higher education and engaging more weekly parent-child interactions score higher on Fatherhood Awareness.
5. The fathers who were under 45 of age, satisfied with their marriage, having received higher education, engaging more weekly parent-child interactions, spending more time, primarily, on kinetic parent-child communications than, secondarily, on extension learning score higher on Fatherhood Awareness.
6. The students’ fathers who score high on family-of-origin fatherhood conduct also score high on fatherhood awareness and conduct. On top of that, the better they do on the family-of-origin fatherhood conduct level, the higher they score on modern father’s fatherhood awareness and conduct.
7. These fathers who score high on fatherhood awareness also score high on fatherhood conduct, and the better they do on awareness, the better they score on the conduct.
8. A reliable predictability on self-fatherhood conduct is hence concluded here by looking at the fifth and sixth graders’ fathers’ awareness and family-of-origin conduct, with the most reliable predictive factors falling on the Living and the Caring factor on the part of the fatherhood awareness scale, and also on the Support factor on the part of the family-of-origin fatherhood conduct scale.
Accordingly, the researcher has since offered in this paper some concrete tips and suggestions to modern parents, educational institutions, business owners and future researches.
|
author2 |
魏慧美 |
author_facet |
魏慧美 江怡文 |
author |
江怡文 |
spellingShingle |
江怡文 高雄市國小高年級學童父親父職覺知與父職實踐關係之研究 |
author_sort |
江怡文 |
title |
高雄市國小高年級學童父親父職覺知與父職實踐關係之研究 |
title_short |
高雄市國小高年級學童父親父職覺知與父職實踐關係之研究 |
title_full |
高雄市國小高年級學童父親父職覺知與父職實踐關係之研究 |
title_fullStr |
高雄市國小高年級學童父親父職覺知與父職實踐關係之研究 |
title_full_unstemmed |
高雄市國小高年級學童父親父職覺知與父職實踐關係之研究 |
title_sort |
高雄市國小高年級學童父親父職覺知與父職實踐關係之研究 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/95718049882957417827 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jiāngyíwén gāoxióngshìguóxiǎogāoniánjíxuétóngfùqīnfùzhíjuézhīyǔfùzhíshíjiànguānxìzhīyánjiū |
_version_ |
1718392044194365440 |