Assessment of the First Stage Performance of Community Forestry Program in Dongshih, Nantou and Hsinchu Forest District, Taiwan Forest Bureau

碩士 === 國立屏東科技大學 === 森林系所 === 96 === Abstract For the sake of forest conservation and the community development, Taiwan Forestry Bureau initiated community forest policy (CFP) since 2002 so as to encourage the community residents participating in the natural resource management. The main purpose of t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chien-Lun Chen, 陳健倫
Other Authors: Kai-An Lo
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2008
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/71482885871611921269
Description
Summary:碩士 === 國立屏東科技大學 === 森林系所 === 96 === Abstract For the sake of forest conservation and the community development, Taiwan Forestry Bureau initiated community forest policy (CFP) since 2002 so as to encourage the community residents participating in the natural resource management. The main purpose of this thesis was to explore what approach can evaluate the performance of the CFP. The results will provide some information to the dicision-makers of the CFP. The methodology of this research was divided the CFP performance framework into 4 affecting demesions (Input of CFP, Input of the other plans, Organization/ Implementation, and Output) and 15 indices from review of the related literature of CFP. AHP is the first approach to elicit the weight of the experts and academy researchers under the previous CFP performance framework. Then the community charger was surveyed by using the same CFP performance framework. The surveyed objects of this study included that the community organations partcipated in the first stage of the CFP, they are all belong to Nantou, Tungshih, and Hsinchu Forest Districtof TFB. We also divided these surveyed objects into four categories: Never apply, Applied one time, New apply, and Apply many times. The results showed that the experts and academy researchers rated Input of CFP (0.32) and Organization/ Implementation (0.36) have higher weight. Finally, we computated total scores from four categories surveyed objects. Never apply was 41% performance (base line), Applied one time was 61%, New apply was 66%, and Apply many times was 74%. This result shows that the CFP is effectiveness.