A study of Tang Hsien-Tsu’s commentary of drama

碩士 === 國立臺灣大學 === 中國文學研究所 === 96 === The commentary of drama was in vogue during the late Ming dynasty, because the amusement demand of civilian, prosperous culture of opera and flourishing development of book publication. In the series of text about “Tang Hsien-Tsu’s commentary of drama”, which wa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pi-Hui Weng, 翁碧慧
Other Authors: 曾永義
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2008
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/16786333571244552218
id ndltd-TW-096NTU05045007
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-096NTU050450072016-05-11T04:16:50Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/16786333571244552218 A study of Tang Hsien-Tsu’s commentary of drama 明代戲曲「湯評本」研究 Pi-Hui Weng 翁碧慧 碩士 國立臺灣大學 中國文學研究所 96 The commentary of drama was in vogue during the late Ming dynasty, because the amusement demand of civilian, prosperous culture of opera and flourishing development of book publication. In the series of text about “Tang Hsien-Tsu’s commentary of drama”, which was thought to be written by Tang Hsien-Tsu himself, were not all Tang Hsien-Tsu’s commentary. Because of distinguishing “the Tang Hsien-Tsu’s commentary of drama” true and false, using these commentary materials is helpful to construct or supply the drama theory of Tang Hsien-Tsu. However, even if the commentary was forged to be Tang Hsien-Tsu''s, it can still exhibit the popular viewpoint of opera at that time. Therefore, a research about this is necessary and valuable. The research methodology of thesis is to grasp all scholar''s dispute. After that, the problems of the commentaries are surveyed in four respects. First, to show the relations between“drama author”, “play writing times” and Tang Hsien-Tsu''s life; Second, to investigate the book workshops and types forged; Third, to compare various of drama commentaries in order to distinguish the relations of drama commentaries; Fourth, to analyze comment intension whether it accords with thoughts, literature and art viewpoints of Tang Hsien-Tsu. The commentaries of “Tung chieh yuen his hsiang” and “Hung fu ji” made by Tang Hsien-Tsu are reliable. We use these commentaries to show Tang Hsien-Tsu''s drama theory. First, though “meaning of song” was valued, the arrangement of plot was emphasized more and more; Second, for personage image-building, impelling personages to be changed into “individualized development” from the “the type” was due to the thought of “true feelings”. The commentaries of “Hung mei ji ”, “I meng ji”, “Chien yu ji” and “Chieh hsia ji” were not made by Tang Hsien-Tsu, but commentators made these like Tang Hsien-Tsu. These commentators, first, followed the theme about “the feeling” and “the dream” of Tang Hsien-Tsu; Second, they paid attention to the lyric words of a song and characterization about “real feelings”; Third, they laid stress on the appearing of plot; Fourth, they thought highly of the need of performing on the field so they had already set up the idea of the libretto, “performs on the field”, gradually. 曾永義 2008 學位論文 ; thesis 293 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立臺灣大學 === 中國文學研究所 === 96 === The commentary of drama was in vogue during the late Ming dynasty, because the amusement demand of civilian, prosperous culture of opera and flourishing development of book publication. In the series of text about “Tang Hsien-Tsu’s commentary of drama”, which was thought to be written by Tang Hsien-Tsu himself, were not all Tang Hsien-Tsu’s commentary. Because of distinguishing “the Tang Hsien-Tsu’s commentary of drama” true and false, using these commentary materials is helpful to construct or supply the drama theory of Tang Hsien-Tsu. However, even if the commentary was forged to be Tang Hsien-Tsu''s, it can still exhibit the popular viewpoint of opera at that time. Therefore, a research about this is necessary and valuable. The research methodology of thesis is to grasp all scholar''s dispute. After that, the problems of the commentaries are surveyed in four respects. First, to show the relations between“drama author”, “play writing times” and Tang Hsien-Tsu''s life; Second, to investigate the book workshops and types forged; Third, to compare various of drama commentaries in order to distinguish the relations of drama commentaries; Fourth, to analyze comment intension whether it accords with thoughts, literature and art viewpoints of Tang Hsien-Tsu. The commentaries of “Tung chieh yuen his hsiang” and “Hung fu ji” made by Tang Hsien-Tsu are reliable. We use these commentaries to show Tang Hsien-Tsu''s drama theory. First, though “meaning of song” was valued, the arrangement of plot was emphasized more and more; Second, for personage image-building, impelling personages to be changed into “individualized development” from the “the type” was due to the thought of “true feelings”. The commentaries of “Hung mei ji ”, “I meng ji”, “Chien yu ji” and “Chieh hsia ji” were not made by Tang Hsien-Tsu, but commentators made these like Tang Hsien-Tsu. These commentators, first, followed the theme about “the feeling” and “the dream” of Tang Hsien-Tsu; Second, they paid attention to the lyric words of a song and characterization about “real feelings”; Third, they laid stress on the appearing of plot; Fourth, they thought highly of the need of performing on the field so they had already set up the idea of the libretto, “performs on the field”, gradually.
author2 曾永義
author_facet 曾永義
Pi-Hui Weng
翁碧慧
author Pi-Hui Weng
翁碧慧
spellingShingle Pi-Hui Weng
翁碧慧
A study of Tang Hsien-Tsu’s commentary of drama
author_sort Pi-Hui Weng
title A study of Tang Hsien-Tsu’s commentary of drama
title_short A study of Tang Hsien-Tsu’s commentary of drama
title_full A study of Tang Hsien-Tsu’s commentary of drama
title_fullStr A study of Tang Hsien-Tsu’s commentary of drama
title_full_unstemmed A study of Tang Hsien-Tsu’s commentary of drama
title_sort study of tang hsien-tsu’s commentary of drama
publishDate 2008
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/16786333571244552218
work_keys_str_mv AT pihuiweng astudyoftanghsientsuscommentaryofdrama
AT wēngbìhuì astudyoftanghsientsuscommentaryofdrama
AT pihuiweng míngdàixìqūtāngpíngběnyánjiū
AT wēngbìhuì míngdàixìqūtāngpíngběnyánjiū
AT pihuiweng studyoftanghsientsuscommentaryofdrama
AT wēngbìhuì studyoftanghsientsuscommentaryofdrama
_version_ 1718265231533146112