The Illusion of Metonymic Presences in Naipaul’s The Mimic Men

碩士 === 東吳大學 === 英文學系 === 96 === The perspective of metonymy is used to examine the postcolonial problems and the difficulties of protagonist in Naipaul’s The Mimic Men. Metonymic presence is the main point for discussion. Metonymic presences are illusions. In this novel, the people of Isabella, a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vicky Peng, 彭婉婷
Other Authors: Joel Janicki
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: 2008
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/10273981662348392192
Description
Summary:碩士 === 東吳大學 === 英文學系 === 96 === The perspective of metonymy is used to examine the postcolonial problems and the difficulties of protagonist in Naipaul’s The Mimic Men. Metonymic presence is the main point for discussion. Metonymic presences are illusions. In this novel, the people of Isabella, and in particular the protagonist Singh, are “mimic men” who are short on vision. They take metonymic presences as truth. Naipaul’s depicts the predicament of the people of Isabella in this novel. The thesis is divided into six chapters. The first chapter elucidates the importance of metonymic presences and introduces the background of this novel. It also outlines Bbabha’s mimicry theory and summarizes the other chapters. The second chapter applies Bhabha’s mimicry theory to analyze this novel and explains all the metonymies in detail. Foucault’s power theory is applied in the third chapter and the power metonymies in this novel are illustrated via his theory. In this chapter, the subtle ways of the power exercise of the colonizer is emphasized. In the fourth chapter, Lacan’s desire theory is applied and the novel’s psychological metonymies are presented. Lacan’s desire theory will be further applied to discuss the desire of the people of Isabella. In the fifth chapter, Derrida’s differance theory is utilized. The differantial metonymies in this novel are identified and explained. In the conclusion, the perspective of metonymy is further applied to analyze Naipaul's novel—Half a Life. Both the protagonists suffer from a sense of an incomplete self.