| Summary: | 碩士 === 世新大學 === 法律學研究所(含碩專班) === 96 === The close integration of research institutes, universities and industries is the core thinking on scientific and technical policies for many countries in the 21st century. It promotes technical innovation and transfer, accelerates the creation, acquirement, accumulation and application of the intellectual property rights, and assists the industry to improve its competence.
The enterprises in our country are largely small and medium-sized. Since the domestic resources are limited, the scale of markets is small and the technical innovation and development are insufficient, the government followed the U.S.A.’s way of promoting the collaboration between industry and academia to carry out the research and development of the key and core technology of the industry. Subsequently it emulated the U.S.A.’s Bayh-Dole Act to approve the Science and Technology Basic Law in early 1999 for the purpose of applying the R&D institute’s technical transfer more flexibly. However, in the face of highly changeable technical conditions and domestic industry structure the technical transfer of collaboration between industry and academia still has many defects to improve.
The purpose of this study is to analyze the effects and derivational problems of the Bayh-Dole Act after being carried out for 1/4 century. Herewith we probe into the causes why the effect of the Science and Technology Basic Law has not been so remarkable since being carried out for 9 years compared to the Bayh-Dole Act. Furthermore we analyze the features of the U.S.A.’s technical transfer conditions, the difficulties and obstacles it faces, and review our country’s technical transfer conditions. Hereby we advance suggestions for improvement.
|
|---|
