| Summary: | 碩士 === 中原大學 === 土木工程研究所 === 97 === The procedures of progressive collapse analysis of buildings is scarce discussed in Taiwan. Two reinforced concrete buildings were used in this study. One is a low-rise building and another is high-rise building. The results were compared between two suggested analysis procedure form GSA and UFC standard.
This analysis use four kinds of method: (1)linear static analysis, (2)linear dynamic analysis, (3)nonlinear static analysis, and (4)nonlinear dynamic analysis, considering the affection of nonlinear behavior and comparing the results between dynamic amplification factor 2.0 for linear analysis and dynamic analysis.
In general analysis, static analysis was easily accepted for engineers than nonlinear dynamic analysis. Hence, this study considers linear static analysis with dynamic amplification factor and compare the result of dynamic analysis, and confirm the feasibility of this method.
|
|---|
