A study of Cheng Yuen-Chìng’s "Li Chi Chi Shui" against Cheng Hsuan’s "Li Chi Chu"

• Main Authors: Chin-Hsiang Lu, 呂欽翔
• Other Authors: 作者未提供
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2009
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/jgmz43

碩士 === 銘傳大學 === 應用中國文學系碩士班 === 97 === Tai Sheng’s "Li Chi " was spread, because Cheng Hsuan wrote "Li Chi Chu" by known information and his knowledge. Today, Cheng Hsuan has much contribution, and so many scholars say that "Li" is Cheng Hsuan’s learning. The later scholar always tread in the steps of Cheng Hsuan, but some scholar correct his mistake because he wrote it at random in different text. So later scholar has many different explanation. If we study their study, we can find correct explanatory notes and correct Cheng Hsuan’s mistake. It won''t change Cheng Hsuan’s contribution because the later scholar saw more information and found more true. The scholar who study "Li Chi " in every dynasty have much contribution. Expecially in Ching Dynasty, they could find more achievement by standing on predecessor’s study. So it’s study of Cheng Yuen-Chìng’s "Li Chi Chi Shui" against Cheng Hsuan’s "Li Chi Chu" and analysis of their right and wrong. Cheng Yuen-Chìng’s "Li Chi Chi Shui" was wrote in winter, 1720. At the same time,books was hard to publish. Because it’s difficult to get sombody’s books, Cheng Yuen-Chìng’s "Li Chi Chi Shui" only displayed the study before the begin of the Ching Dynasty. He quoted the argument of Wan Ssu-Ta, Mao Chi-Ling, Chu I-Tsun, etc. If Cheng Yuen-Chìng and somebody in the meanwhile have the same study, it’s just the coincidence. The study want to find out Cheng Hsuan and Cheng Yuen-Chìng’s right and wrong, and so it discusses the true in different chapters for Cheng Yuen-Chìng’s "Li Chi Chi Shui" correct Cheng Hsuan’s "Li Chi Chu", Cheng Yuen-Chìng’s "Li Chi Chi Shui" against Cheng Hsuan’s "Li Chi Chu" is wrong, Cheng Yuen-Chìng’s "Li Chi Chi Shui" and Cheng Hsuan’s "Li Chi Chu" coexist, and Cheng Yuen-Chìng’s "Li Chi Chi Shui" leaving a question open. Cheng Yuen-Chìng’s "Li Chi Chi Shui" correcting Cheng Hsuan’s "Li Chi Chu" is Cheng Yuen-Chìng’s contribution. Cheng Yuen-Chìng’s "Li Chi Chi Shui" against Cheng Hsuan’s "Li Chi Chu" is wrong means Cheng Yuen-Chìng’s fault. Cheng Yuen-Chìng’s "Li Chi Chi Shui" and Cheng Hsuan’s "Li Chi Chu" coexist means they would be correct. Cheng Yuen-Chìng’s "Li Chi Chi Shui" leaves a question open means Cheng Yuen-Chìng can’t be against Cheng Hsuan and Cheng Yuen-Chìng is uncertain wrong. Cheng Yuen-Chìng may be have some referral. Therefore, four different subject has four sections of basing on somebody, copying somebody, being idential with somebody, and Cheng Yuen-Chìng saying along. Basing on somebody and copying somebody is that one’s contribution. Finding that Cheng Yuen-Chìng copies who saying first and he has contribution. Maybe that one was person of the Ching Dynasty or before the Ching Dynasty in the section of being idential with somebody. That thay say it equivalently could be right. If I can’t find the same comment, temporarily I will make it belong to the section of the Cheng Yuen-Chìng saying along, because I may find it someday. When Cheng Yuen-Chìng’s "Li Chi Chi Shui" against Cheng Hsuan’s "Li Chi Chu" is wrong, I name it " Cheng’s wrong say ". When Cheng Yuen-Chìng’s "Li Chi Chi Shui" and Cheng Hsuan’s "Li Chi Chu" coexist, I name it " Cheng’s new say ".When Cheng Yuen-Chìng’s "Li Chi Chi Shui" leaves a question open, I name it " Cheng’s personal say " . They are all Cheng Yuen-Chìng’s personal say, but different chapters should have different name because it means different meaning.