國民中學教師評鑑制度之研究─以台中縣為例
碩士 === 國立彰化師範大學 === 工業教育與技術學系 === 97 === ABSTRACT The main purposes of this study were to discuss the different opinions of junior high school teachers in Taichung County toward the proposal “Subsidy to The Probationary Plan for Teacher Evaluation” carried out by Ministry Of Education, and to propos...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
2008
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/47306852314670020841 |
id |
ndltd-TW-097NCUE5037014 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-097NCUE50370142015-10-13T11:20:17Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/47306852314670020841 國民中學教師評鑑制度之研究─以台中縣為例 邱傳森 碩士 國立彰化師範大學 工業教育與技術學系 97 ABSTRACT The main purposes of this study were to discuss the different opinions of junior high school teachers in Taichung County toward the proposal “Subsidy to The Probationary Plan for Teacher Evaluation” carried out by Ministry Of Education, and to propose concrete suggestions according to the results of the study. Questionnaire survey method was applied in this study. The questionnaires were formally used on junior high school teachers of Taichung County and the results were analyzed by statistical methods. The information from open opinions was also collected. The conclusions of the study were as follows: 1.Teachers agreed with the notion of the evaluation, but tended to disagree with the evaluation measures because of the influences caused from interpersonal relationship and the lack of equitableness. 2.Teachers considered that the evaluation should be put emphasis on the formative purposes and assisted with the summative purposes. 3.Teachers approved that the order to perform teacher evaluation was: a. self-evaluation b. evaluated by teams which were formed by school staff. And teachers disapproved of the method “evaluated by students”. 4.Teachers tended to agree to list “class management and counselling” , “teachers’ further education” and “good working attitude” into the evaluation items, but disagreed with the item “students’ academic achievement”. 5.Teachers of younger age and lower seniority, and those who hold the post as school administrative personnel, tended to agree with the measures and contents of teacher evaluation. Key words: teacher evaluation, the measures of teacher evaluation, the contents of teacher evaluation 鄭友超 2008 學位論文 ; thesis 222 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 國立彰化師範大學 === 工業教育與技術學系 === 97 === ABSTRACT
The main purposes of this study were to discuss the different opinions of junior high school teachers in Taichung County toward the proposal “Subsidy to The Probationary Plan for Teacher Evaluation” carried out by Ministry Of Education, and to propose concrete suggestions according to the results of the study.
Questionnaire survey method was applied in this study. The questionnaires were formally used on junior high school teachers of Taichung County and the results were analyzed by statistical methods. The information from open opinions was also collected. The conclusions of the study were as follows:
1.Teachers agreed with the notion of the evaluation, but tended to disagree with the evaluation measures because of the influences caused from interpersonal relationship and the lack of equitableness.
2.Teachers considered that the evaluation should be put emphasis on the formative purposes and assisted with the summative purposes.
3.Teachers approved that the order to perform teacher evaluation was: a. self-evaluation b. evaluated by teams which were formed by school staff. And teachers disapproved of the method “evaluated by students”.
4.Teachers tended to agree to list “class management and counselling” , “teachers’ further education” and “good working attitude” into the evaluation items, but disagreed with the item “students’ academic achievement”.
5.Teachers of younger age and lower seniority, and those who hold the post as school administrative personnel, tended to agree with the measures and contents of teacher evaluation.
Key words: teacher evaluation, the measures of teacher evaluation, the contents of teacher evaluation
|
author2 |
鄭友超 |
author_facet |
鄭友超 邱傳森 |
author |
邱傳森 |
spellingShingle |
邱傳森 國民中學教師評鑑制度之研究─以台中縣為例 |
author_sort |
邱傳森 |
title |
國民中學教師評鑑制度之研究─以台中縣為例 |
title_short |
國民中學教師評鑑制度之研究─以台中縣為例 |
title_full |
國民中學教師評鑑制度之研究─以台中縣為例 |
title_fullStr |
國民中學教師評鑑制度之研究─以台中縣為例 |
title_full_unstemmed |
國民中學教師評鑑制度之研究─以台中縣為例 |
title_sort |
國民中學教師評鑑制度之研究─以台中縣為例 |
publishDate |
2008 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/47306852314670020841 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT qiūchuánsēn guómínzhōngxuéjiàoshīpíngjiànzhìdùzhīyánjiūyǐtáizhōngxiànwèilì |
_version_ |
1716841562071105536 |