A Study of Performance Evaluation Index with AHP to Military Factory GOCO

• Main Authors: FU JEN YI, 傅任翊
• Other Authors: 劉自強
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2009
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/65994380852534320713

碩士 === 國防大學國防管理學院 === 國防財務資源研究所 === 97 === In the past, the military weapons and equipment of our nation were maintained by national military factories. Due to long-time protection by policy and the producing cost was not important, it was not necessary to consider the real demand and satisfaction. Today, with the policy of military factory civilization, military maintenance and logistics business have been gradually transferred to citizens and this opportunity of such business models are expanding. In order to ensure the success of the civil-run strategy, the establishment of an effective evaluation is necessary. It is not only to reduce the impact to military that the risk of contractual violation caused by vendors, but also to improve the quality and effectiveness of performing contract. Although, our military has some certain operation procedures to outsource such manufacture and management, it does not have a complete mechanism of the performance monitoring and assessment. It often causes that the military is difficult to control the effectiveness of requirement or service to be fulfilled, the quality to be ensured and maintained, finally it makes the contract a mere formality, the input cost doesn’t earn its real value. With the consideration of security, reliability and training requirement of military, a reasonable evaluation mechanism needs to be developed to evaluate the products, services of performance provided by vendors. In this study, the civilization project investigates the 2nd Air Force Logistics Command owned factory and assessed its models of performance assessment. Through the literature and interviews with experts, we concluded the six aspects which were the quality capability, delivery capability, technical capacity, supply capacity, service capacity cooperation and coordination capabilities, either used the 18 indicators as means of selection. Having made survey with questionnaire and utilized and the group decision analysis in Analytic Hierarchy Process （AHP）, we acquired the weight ratio between each aspects and indicators, built objective and fair models of performance assessment, provided a mechanism for amending the existing performance audit, planed the future cases of nation-owned/civil-run solicitation, and made some references for contract signing and vendor selection.