Combining Facts and Values in Environmental Impact Assessment- Apply for KaoKaoPing Basin Water Resource Plan

碩士 === 國立中山大學 === 公共事務管理研究所 === 97 === Combining Facts and Values in Environmental Impact Assessment- Apply for KaoKaoPing Basin Water Resource Plan Abstract Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is a process that empowers public to involve public affairs. It starts from 1994. Due to governor didn...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hung-Chun Wu, 吳鴻駿
Other Authors: Ming-Sheng Wang
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2009
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/e749a7
id ndltd-TW-097NSYS5636055
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-097NSYS56360552019-05-30T03:49:41Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/e749a7 Combining Facts and Values in Environmental Impact Assessment- Apply for KaoKaoPing Basin Water Resource Plan 結合事實與價值的環境評估決策模式-以高屏溪流域水資源開發計畫為例 Hung-Chun Wu 吳鴻駿 碩士 國立中山大學 公共事務管理研究所 97 Combining Facts and Values in Environmental Impact Assessment- Apply for KaoKaoPing Basin Water Resource Plan Abstract Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is a process that empowers public to involve public affairs. It starts from 1994. Due to governor didn’t give a real power to public, so conflict haven’t stopped. On the other side, public policy mix subjective value and objective fact in one, it causes problems when decision was made. How to resolve the conflict is a problem that governor need to know. This study will focus on this issue, and try to provide a answer. SAGE(Social judgment capturing -- Adaptive -- Goals-achievement -- Environmental assessment, SAGE)can separate value from fact first, and then combine two factor in one formula to get the best alternative. In subjective one, it base on Social Judgment Theory (SJT). This study gets three objectives from thesis, environmental and ecological conservation, economic effect, and social fair. It is a basement that the stakeholder uses by to make a judgment. In this study, each objective has three attributes. The objectives also contact with attributes and goals. And then, It can produce two kind of data, the one is subjective value weight and function type. It can display how the stakeholder judges. Get this information can help us to resolve the conflict between two groups who have different value preference. This study shows that different decision groups that base on different area have the same value preference. ‘Environmental and ecological conservation’ get the highest value weight, the second is ‘social fair’, the third is ‘economic effect’. Finally, this study gets the better alternative, It gets the higher score in three attribute of the objective, so plus value weight it also has the higher score. Key word: SAGE, SJT, EIA Ming-Sheng Wang 汪銘生 2009 學位論文 ; thesis 172 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立中山大學 === 公共事務管理研究所 === 97 === Combining Facts and Values in Environmental Impact Assessment- Apply for KaoKaoPing Basin Water Resource Plan Abstract Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is a process that empowers public to involve public affairs. It starts from 1994. Due to governor didn’t give a real power to public, so conflict haven’t stopped. On the other side, public policy mix subjective value and objective fact in one, it causes problems when decision was made. How to resolve the conflict is a problem that governor need to know. This study will focus on this issue, and try to provide a answer. SAGE(Social judgment capturing -- Adaptive -- Goals-achievement -- Environmental assessment, SAGE)can separate value from fact first, and then combine two factor in one formula to get the best alternative. In subjective one, it base on Social Judgment Theory (SJT). This study gets three objectives from thesis, environmental and ecological conservation, economic effect, and social fair. It is a basement that the stakeholder uses by to make a judgment. In this study, each objective has three attributes. The objectives also contact with attributes and goals. And then, It can produce two kind of data, the one is subjective value weight and function type. It can display how the stakeholder judges. Get this information can help us to resolve the conflict between two groups who have different value preference. This study shows that different decision groups that base on different area have the same value preference. ‘Environmental and ecological conservation’ get the highest value weight, the second is ‘social fair’, the third is ‘economic effect’. Finally, this study gets the better alternative, It gets the higher score in three attribute of the objective, so plus value weight it also has the higher score. Key word: SAGE, SJT, EIA
author2 Ming-Sheng Wang
author_facet Ming-Sheng Wang
Hung-Chun Wu
吳鴻駿
author Hung-Chun Wu
吳鴻駿
spellingShingle Hung-Chun Wu
吳鴻駿
Combining Facts and Values in Environmental Impact Assessment- Apply for KaoKaoPing Basin Water Resource Plan
author_sort Hung-Chun Wu
title Combining Facts and Values in Environmental Impact Assessment- Apply for KaoKaoPing Basin Water Resource Plan
title_short Combining Facts and Values in Environmental Impact Assessment- Apply for KaoKaoPing Basin Water Resource Plan
title_full Combining Facts and Values in Environmental Impact Assessment- Apply for KaoKaoPing Basin Water Resource Plan
title_fullStr Combining Facts and Values in Environmental Impact Assessment- Apply for KaoKaoPing Basin Water Resource Plan
title_full_unstemmed Combining Facts and Values in Environmental Impact Assessment- Apply for KaoKaoPing Basin Water Resource Plan
title_sort combining facts and values in environmental impact assessment- apply for kaokaoping basin water resource plan
publishDate 2009
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/e749a7
work_keys_str_mv AT hungchunwu combiningfactsandvaluesinenvironmentalimpactassessmentapplyforkaokaopingbasinwaterresourceplan
AT wúhóngjùn combiningfactsandvaluesinenvironmentalimpactassessmentapplyforkaokaopingbasinwaterresourceplan
AT hungchunwu jiéhéshìshíyǔjiàzhídehuánjìngpínggūjuécèmóshìyǐgāopíngxīliúyùshuǐzīyuánkāifājìhuàwèilì
AT wúhóngjùn jiéhéshìshíyǔjiàzhídehuánjìngpínggūjuécèmóshìyǐgāopíngxīliúyùshuǐzīyuánkāifājìhuàwèilì
_version_ 1719193510064685056