The Comparison of Environmental Ethic in the Eco-literature of Ke-Xiang Liu and Xia Man-Lan Bo An
碩士 === 國立臺南大學 === 生態旅遊研究所碩士班 === 97 === According to the fifty-two Eco-literature works written by Ke-Xiang Liu, those works shows his great concern toward the present environmental problems. He believes that the governmental policy, education and the literature can help people to learn the ecologic...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Others |
| Language: | zh-TW |
| Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/11222794338542761747 |
| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立臺南大學 === 生態旅遊研究所碩士班 === 97 === According to the fifty-two Eco-literature works written by Ke-Xiang Liu, those works shows his great concern toward the present environmental problems. He believes that the governmental policy, education and the literature can help people to learn the ecological knowledge even construct the basic environmental conception. Furthermore, people can develop ecological conscience and accurate ecosophy so that they can solve the environmental problems and face the environmental with a more responsible attitude. Xia Man-Lan Bo An’s four Eco-literature works show that he identifies himself with the culture and the combination between his people and the environment. Xia Man-Lan Bo An learns ecological knowledge and the respect toward the environment from daily life then turn them into the inner wisdom which can make the environment and the resource remain stable.
According to the content of The Land Ethic, both Ke-Xiang Liu and Xia Man-Lan Bo An’s works are similar to the land ethic. The environmental concern of these two authors expend from the individuals to the wholes. They think the natural resource should be used under the prerequisite of remaining the whole system stable. The difference between these two authors is the execution of the land ethic. Ke-Xiang Liu stands for a modern way which is the learning of ecological knowledge; instead Xia Man-Lan Bo An stands for a traditional way which is the learning from their people especially how they make good use of the natural resource.
|
|---|