| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立臺灣大學 === 新聞研究所 === 97 === The domestic researches about professionalism of reporter generality are transplanted from the three categorization of research about professionalism of reporter in west. By lack of the integration about the background of Taiwan social history, result in the connotation of professionalism of Taiwan reporters can only be cramming with the category image of professionalism of reporters in western. To ground on it, this research select the particular history period and reporters--- the reporter of Independent Post which major in social movement in the 1980’s Taiwan with flourishing growth of social movement as the mainly study subject and period. This research take the way of Life History attempt to start against the history and social culture of Taiwan to combine with the reporter’s individual life course and practice, so as to review the rationality and seasonable of past western professionalism’s categorization, and re-treat and ponder the connotation of professionalism of Taiwan reporters. To arrange the images of professionalism of reporters belong to Taiwan experience.
This research brings up two layers of major study cores. The first: On the option and ideal. The reporter of Independent Post which major in social movement take what kind of professionalism to involve the career ? And how does the professionalism arise? Why they will choose work in Independent Post ? Why they will choose to major in the social movement? The second: In the practice of the field of reporters. How the reporters of Independent Post which major in social movement to influence the practice of field of reporters major in the social movement nowadays by their experience of interview about subject of social movement and minority？And how do they to deal with the relationships between social movement and minority？
The meanings of take of way of Life History in this research is in the process of concretion those minor reporters can look after the subjective activity of reporters, and the possibility of history and environment at the same time. To realize in depth what to influence those reporters who under the society, press, individual causes, the character and professionalism of himself entertain all the kinds of options about interview in live, reports, and practice of life of reporters. Even affect how to deal with the relationships between the groups of social movement and the minority. So as to opening up a new way to researchers in the field of mass media.
|
|---|
