Buckling Behavior of H-Beams Braced by Torsional Braces

碩士 === 國立臺灣科技大學 === 營建工程系 === 97 === Beam is one of the elements of structures which resists bending moment. When steel beam is not supported properly by braces, lateral-torsional buckling may become a major problem. Therefore, finite element simulation is done to analyze the beam braced by nodal to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wijono Ramli, S.T., 李偉德
Other Authors: Cheng-Cheng Chen
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: 2009
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/42641122354690045949
Description
Summary:碩士 === 國立臺灣科技大學 === 營建工程系 === 97 === Beam is one of the elements of structures which resists bending moment. When steel beam is not supported properly by braces, lateral-torsional buckling may become a major problem. Therefore, finite element simulation is done to analyze the beam braced by nodal torsional braces. Abaqus, one of the products of Simulia, is used to analyze the beam. Two kinds of analyses is done. Those analyses are buckling analysis and load versus displacement analysis. Buckling analysis is done because its first mode Eigen value is used as initial imperfection shape in load versus displacement analysis. H600 × 200 × 11 × 17, H592 × 350 × 16 × 36, and H792 × 350 × 19 × 36 beam sections are studied. Each of them has different DT value which is a factor that involves in lateral-torsional buckling. A continuous lateral brace is provided to represent concrete slabs. Three kinds of lateral supports are used for each beam section: (1) two nodal torsional braces, (2) a continuous lateral brace only on top flange and two nodal torsional braces, and (3) a continuous lateral brace only on top flange and two nodal lateral braces. Based on the analysis results obtained, following conclusion can be drawn: (1) following AISC specification about the unbraced length, Ls can be used to determine the position of braces, (2) two percent rule can be used as an orientation in design, (3) beams with high DT value are less susceptible to lateral-torsional buckling, (4) beam with a continuous lateral brace only on top flange and nodal torsional braces has higher plastic hinge rotation capacity than beam with a continuous lateral brace only on top flange and nodal lateral braces, (5) beam without reduced section has 3% rad plastic hinge rotation capacity higher than beam with reduced section (RBS) when they are braced by nodal torsional braces, (6) a continuous lateral brace attached to beam increases beam plastic hinge rotation capacity, and (7) the benefit of providing beam with braces is 2% rad plastic hinge rotation higher than beam without braces.