A Comparison between Structured and Object-Oriented Systems Analysis and Development: Modeling Tools and Artifact
碩士 === 國立中山大學 === 資訊管理學系研究所 === 98 === Since the Software Engineering Institute published the Capability Maturity Method Integration (CMMI) in 2003, many software firms have implemented it to enhance its software quality assurance and international collaboration. Analysis...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Others |
| Language: | zh-TW |
| Published: |
2010
|
| Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/58863640347262217381 |
| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立中山大學 === 資訊管理學系研究所 === 98 === Since the Software Engineering Institute published the Capability Maturity
Method Integration (CMMI) in 2003, many software firms have implemented it to
enhance its software quality assurance and international collaboration. Analysis and
design phases are two important phases for the software development. The artifacts of
these two phases mainly represented using the structured technique or the
object-oriented technique. This study proposed a methodology which provides
guidelines to compare the artifacts of these two techniques for an embedded system. The research methodology is articulated using the design science research methodology. A usability valuation with a real-world embedded system case is performed to demonstrate its applicability. The results provide evidences to enhance our understanding about the strength and weakness of these two nalysis and design techniques.
|
|---|