A Comparison between Structured and Object-Oriented Systems Analysis and Development: Modeling Tools and Artifact

碩士 === 國立中山大學 === 資訊管理學系研究所 === 98 === Since the Software Engineering Institute published the Capability Maturity Method Integration (CMMI) in 2003, many software firms have implemented it to enhance its software quality assurance and international collaboration. Analysis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chien-hung Lin, 林建宏
Other Authors: Jen-Her Wu
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2010
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/58863640347262217381
id ndltd-TW-098NSYS5396020
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-098NSYS53960202015-10-13T18:39:45Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/58863640347262217381 A Comparison between Structured and Object-Oriented Systems Analysis and Development: Modeling Tools and Artifact 結構化與物件導向系統分析與設計之比較:塑模工具與產出 Chien-hung Lin 林建宏 碩士 國立中山大學 資訊管理學系研究所 98 Since the Software Engineering Institute published the Capability Maturity Method Integration (CMMI) in 2003, many software firms have implemented it to enhance its software quality assurance and international collaboration. Analysis and design phases are two important phases for the software development. The artifacts of these two phases mainly represented using the structured technique or the object-oriented technique. This study proposed a methodology which provides guidelines to compare the artifacts of these two techniques for an embedded system. The research methodology is articulated using the design science research methodology. A usability valuation with a real-world embedded system case is performed to demonstrate its applicability. The results provide evidences to enhance our understanding about the strength and weakness of these two nalysis and design techniques. Jen-Her Wu 吳仁和 2010 學位論文 ; thesis 117 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立中山大學 === 資訊管理學系研究所 === 98 === Since the Software Engineering Institute published the Capability Maturity Method Integration (CMMI) in 2003, many software firms have implemented it to enhance its software quality assurance and international collaboration. Analysis and design phases are two important phases for the software development. The artifacts of these two phases mainly represented using the structured technique or the object-oriented technique. This study proposed a methodology which provides guidelines to compare the artifacts of these two techniques for an embedded system. The research methodology is articulated using the design science research methodology. A usability valuation with a real-world embedded system case is performed to demonstrate its applicability. The results provide evidences to enhance our understanding about the strength and weakness of these two nalysis and design techniques.
author2 Jen-Her Wu
author_facet Jen-Her Wu
Chien-hung Lin
林建宏
author Chien-hung Lin
林建宏
spellingShingle Chien-hung Lin
林建宏
A Comparison between Structured and Object-Oriented Systems Analysis and Development: Modeling Tools and Artifact
author_sort Chien-hung Lin
title A Comparison between Structured and Object-Oriented Systems Analysis and Development: Modeling Tools and Artifact
title_short A Comparison between Structured and Object-Oriented Systems Analysis and Development: Modeling Tools and Artifact
title_full A Comparison between Structured and Object-Oriented Systems Analysis and Development: Modeling Tools and Artifact
title_fullStr A Comparison between Structured and Object-Oriented Systems Analysis and Development: Modeling Tools and Artifact
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison between Structured and Object-Oriented Systems Analysis and Development: Modeling Tools and Artifact
title_sort comparison between structured and object-oriented systems analysis and development: modeling tools and artifact
publishDate 2010
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/58863640347262217381
work_keys_str_mv AT chienhunglin acomparisonbetweenstructuredandobjectorientedsystemsanalysisanddevelopmentmodelingtoolsandartifact
AT línjiànhóng acomparisonbetweenstructuredandobjectorientedsystemsanalysisanddevelopmentmodelingtoolsandartifact
AT chienhunglin jiégòuhuàyǔwùjiàndǎoxiàngxìtǒngfēnxīyǔshèjìzhībǐjiàosùmógōngjùyǔchǎnchū
AT línjiànhóng jiégòuhuàyǔwùjiàndǎoxiàngxìtǒngfēnxīyǔshèjìzhībǐjiàosùmógōngjùyǔchǎnchū
AT chienhunglin comparisonbetweenstructuredandobjectorientedsystemsanalysisanddevelopmentmodelingtoolsandartifact
AT línjiànhóng comparisonbetweenstructuredandobjectorientedsystemsanalysisanddevelopmentmodelingtoolsandartifact
_version_ 1718035856701259776