A Comparison between Structured and Object-Oriented Systems Analysis and Development: Modeling Tools and Artifact
碩士 === 國立中山大學 === 資訊管理學系研究所 === 98 === Since the Software Engineering Institute published the Capability Maturity Method Integration (CMMI) in 2003, many software firms have implemented it to enhance its software quality assurance and international collaboration. Analysis...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
2010
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/58863640347262217381 |
id |
ndltd-TW-098NSYS5396020 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-098NSYS53960202015-10-13T18:39:45Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/58863640347262217381 A Comparison between Structured and Object-Oriented Systems Analysis and Development: Modeling Tools and Artifact 結構化與物件導向系統分析與設計之比較:塑模工具與產出 Chien-hung Lin 林建宏 碩士 國立中山大學 資訊管理學系研究所 98 Since the Software Engineering Institute published the Capability Maturity Method Integration (CMMI) in 2003, many software firms have implemented it to enhance its software quality assurance and international collaboration. Analysis and design phases are two important phases for the software development. The artifacts of these two phases mainly represented using the structured technique or the object-oriented technique. This study proposed a methodology which provides guidelines to compare the artifacts of these two techniques for an embedded system. The research methodology is articulated using the design science research methodology. A usability valuation with a real-world embedded system case is performed to demonstrate its applicability. The results provide evidences to enhance our understanding about the strength and weakness of these two nalysis and design techniques. Jen-Her Wu 吳仁和 2010 學位論文 ; thesis 117 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 國立中山大學 === 資訊管理學系研究所 === 98 === Since the Software Engineering Institute published the Capability Maturity
Method Integration (CMMI) in 2003, many software firms have implemented it to
enhance its software quality assurance and international collaboration. Analysis and
design phases are two important phases for the software development. The artifacts of
these two phases mainly represented using the structured technique or the
object-oriented technique. This study proposed a methodology which provides
guidelines to compare the artifacts of these two techniques for an embedded system. The research methodology is articulated using the design science research methodology. A usability valuation with a real-world embedded system case is performed to demonstrate its applicability. The results provide evidences to enhance our understanding about the strength and weakness of these two nalysis and design techniques.
|
author2 |
Jen-Her Wu |
author_facet |
Jen-Her Wu Chien-hung Lin 林建宏 |
author |
Chien-hung Lin 林建宏 |
spellingShingle |
Chien-hung Lin 林建宏 A Comparison between Structured and Object-Oriented Systems Analysis and Development: Modeling Tools and Artifact |
author_sort |
Chien-hung Lin |
title |
A Comparison between Structured and Object-Oriented Systems Analysis and Development: Modeling Tools and Artifact |
title_short |
A Comparison between Structured and Object-Oriented Systems Analysis and Development: Modeling Tools and Artifact |
title_full |
A Comparison between Structured and Object-Oriented Systems Analysis and Development: Modeling Tools and Artifact |
title_fullStr |
A Comparison between Structured and Object-Oriented Systems Analysis and Development: Modeling Tools and Artifact |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Comparison between Structured and Object-Oriented Systems Analysis and Development: Modeling Tools and Artifact |
title_sort |
comparison between structured and object-oriented systems analysis and development: modeling tools and artifact |
publishDate |
2010 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/58863640347262217381 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT chienhunglin acomparisonbetweenstructuredandobjectorientedsystemsanalysisanddevelopmentmodelingtoolsandartifact AT línjiànhóng acomparisonbetweenstructuredandobjectorientedsystemsanalysisanddevelopmentmodelingtoolsandartifact AT chienhunglin jiégòuhuàyǔwùjiàndǎoxiàngxìtǒngfēnxīyǔshèjìzhībǐjiàosùmógōngjùyǔchǎnchū AT línjiànhóng jiégòuhuàyǔwùjiàndǎoxiàngxìtǒngfēnxīyǔshèjìzhībǐjiàosùmógōngjùyǔchǎnchū AT chienhunglin comparisonbetweenstructuredandobjectorientedsystemsanalysisanddevelopmentmodelingtoolsandartifact AT línjiànhóng comparisonbetweenstructuredandobjectorientedsystemsanalysisanddevelopmentmodelingtoolsandartifact |
_version_ |
1718035856701259776 |