A Study on Handwritten Character Recognition
碩士 === 臺灣大學 === 資訊工程學研究所 === 98 === There are many applications for handwritten character recognition, such as signature verification, handwritten address recognition, pen-based input method used in PDA etc. In this thesis, we just consider offline character recognition because it is the basic build...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
2010
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/04065851585956727358 |
id |
ndltd-TW-098NTU05392030 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-098NTU053920302015-10-13T18:49:38Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/04065851585956727358 A Study on Handwritten Character Recognition 手寫文字辨識之研究 Chu-Chong Hoi 許主聰 碩士 臺灣大學 資訊工程學研究所 98 There are many applications for handwritten character recognition, such as signature verification, handwritten address recognition, pen-based input method used in PDA etc. In this thesis, we just consider offline character recognition because it is the basic building block of many complicate handwriting recognition system. We compare four techniques for handwritten recognition. They are PCA, LDA, NMF and ICA. The result shows that PCA has the highest accuracy. LDA has the lowest accuracy due to small training data set. The difference of performance between ICA and PCA is small. NMF only need smaller number of basis images within each class when considering class information. 劉長遠 2010 學位論文 ; thesis 32 en_US |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en_US |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 臺灣大學 === 資訊工程學研究所 === 98 === There are many applications for handwritten character recognition, such as signature verification, handwritten address recognition, pen-based input method used in PDA etc. In this thesis, we just consider offline character recognition because it is the basic building block of many complicate handwriting recognition system. We compare four techniques for handwritten recognition. They are PCA, LDA, NMF and ICA. The result shows that PCA has the highest accuracy. LDA has the lowest accuracy due to small training data set. The difference of performance between ICA and PCA is small. NMF only need smaller number of basis images within each class when considering class information.
|
author2 |
劉長遠 |
author_facet |
劉長遠 Chu-Chong Hoi 許主聰 |
author |
Chu-Chong Hoi 許主聰 |
spellingShingle |
Chu-Chong Hoi 許主聰 A Study on Handwritten Character Recognition |
author_sort |
Chu-Chong Hoi |
title |
A Study on Handwritten Character Recognition |
title_short |
A Study on Handwritten Character Recognition |
title_full |
A Study on Handwritten Character Recognition |
title_fullStr |
A Study on Handwritten Character Recognition |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Study on Handwritten Character Recognition |
title_sort |
study on handwritten character recognition |
publishDate |
2010 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/04065851585956727358 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT chuchonghoi astudyonhandwrittencharacterrecognition AT xǔzhǔcōng astudyonhandwrittencharacterrecognition AT chuchonghoi shǒuxiěwénzìbiànshízhīyánjiū AT xǔzhǔcōng shǒuxiěwénzìbiànshízhīyánjiū AT chuchonghoi studyonhandwrittencharacterrecognition AT xǔzhǔcōng studyonhandwrittencharacterrecognition |
_version_ |
1718037578028941312 |