A Study on Handwritten Character Recognition

碩士 === 臺灣大學 === 資訊工程學研究所 === 98 === There are many applications for handwritten character recognition, such as signature verification, handwritten address recognition, pen-based input method used in PDA etc. In this thesis, we just consider offline character recognition because it is the basic build...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chu-Chong Hoi, 許主聰
Other Authors: 劉長遠
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: 2010
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/04065851585956727358
id ndltd-TW-098NTU05392030
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-098NTU053920302015-10-13T18:49:38Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/04065851585956727358 A Study on Handwritten Character Recognition 手寫文字辨識之研究 Chu-Chong Hoi 許主聰 碩士 臺灣大學 資訊工程學研究所 98 There are many applications for handwritten character recognition, such as signature verification, handwritten address recognition, pen-based input method used in PDA etc. In this thesis, we just consider offline character recognition because it is the basic building block of many complicate handwriting recognition system. We compare four techniques for handwritten recognition. They are PCA, LDA, NMF and ICA. The result shows that PCA has the highest accuracy. LDA has the lowest accuracy due to small training data set. The difference of performance between ICA and PCA is small. NMF only need smaller number of basis images within each class when considering class information. 劉長遠 2010 學位論文 ; thesis 32 en_US
collection NDLTD
language en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 臺灣大學 === 資訊工程學研究所 === 98 === There are many applications for handwritten character recognition, such as signature verification, handwritten address recognition, pen-based input method used in PDA etc. In this thesis, we just consider offline character recognition because it is the basic building block of many complicate handwriting recognition system. We compare four techniques for handwritten recognition. They are PCA, LDA, NMF and ICA. The result shows that PCA has the highest accuracy. LDA has the lowest accuracy due to small training data set. The difference of performance between ICA and PCA is small. NMF only need smaller number of basis images within each class when considering class information.
author2 劉長遠
author_facet 劉長遠
Chu-Chong Hoi
許主聰
author Chu-Chong Hoi
許主聰
spellingShingle Chu-Chong Hoi
許主聰
A Study on Handwritten Character Recognition
author_sort Chu-Chong Hoi
title A Study on Handwritten Character Recognition
title_short A Study on Handwritten Character Recognition
title_full A Study on Handwritten Character Recognition
title_fullStr A Study on Handwritten Character Recognition
title_full_unstemmed A Study on Handwritten Character Recognition
title_sort study on handwritten character recognition
publishDate 2010
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/04065851585956727358
work_keys_str_mv AT chuchonghoi astudyonhandwrittencharacterrecognition
AT xǔzhǔcōng astudyonhandwrittencharacterrecognition
AT chuchonghoi shǒuxiěwénzìbiànshízhīyánjiū
AT xǔzhǔcōng shǒuxiěwénzìbiànshízhīyánjiū
AT chuchonghoi studyonhandwrittencharacterrecognition
AT xǔzhǔcōng studyonhandwrittencharacterrecognition
_version_ 1718037578028941312