The Correlation Study Bewteen Self Efficacy and Teaching Efficacy of Teacher in Adventure Education Lecture

碩士 === 亞洲大學 === 休閒與遊憩管理學系碩士在職專班 === 98 === This research was focused on the correlation study between self efficacy and teaching efficacy of teacher in adventure education lecture and the difference between self efficacy and teaching efficacy of teacher in different individual variables. Moreover, w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: YANG,MING-CHU, 楊明珠
Other Authors: SHEN,YI-LI
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2010
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/81924110183748906243
Description
Summary:碩士 === 亞洲大學 === 休閒與遊憩管理學系碩士在職專班 === 98 === This research was focused on the correlation study between self efficacy and teaching efficacy of teacher in adventure education lecture and the difference between self efficacy and teaching efficacy of teacher in different individual variables. Moreover, we comprehend deeply predictive utility on dimensions of self efficacy and teaching efficacy of teacher. This study was adopted the questionnaire survey that we invited 33 lecturers who instruct adventure education course at Youth Senior High School, Taichung and went with 2-months adventure education lecture. The data were analysis by Descriptive Analysis, T-test, ANOVA, Product-moment Correlation and Stepwise Multiple Regression from SPSS 12.0. The results were as following. 1. We found there were well performances in self efficacy and teaching efficacy of teacher. The mark of”internal self efficacy” was higher than “contrary self efficacy”. 2. There was positive correlation (r=.649) between self efficacy and teaching efficacy for teacher. 3. There existed significant difference between self efficacy and teaching efficacy for teacher in 2-month lecture. 4. There was no difference among “seniority of adventure course, seniority, full-time work, position and subject” except “gender” in self efficacy and teaching efficacy of teacher. 5. The united prediction of self efficacy and teaching efficacy came up to 41.2%and 52%. The prediction of dimension in “contrary self efficacy” fulfilled with 41.2% and 52%. After 2-month course, the prediction (51.2% and 50.3%) of self efficacy and teaching efficacy was better than those before the course. Therefore, we found there was positive prediction