| Summary: | 碩士 === 淡江大學 === 課程與教學研究所碩士班 === 98 === This study is to construct suitable for Taiwan''s Mandarin Writing Assessment Criteria For Junior High School”to analyze and summarize assessment criteria in the proper orientation to provide junior high school, according to Mandarin teaching and composition and basic competence for junior high school. To achieve these purposes, this study through “Mandarin Writing Assessment Criteria For Junior High School Criteria” for the Construction of the dimensions of the project process.
In the dimension of the project construction stage, the literature review, the theoretical basis, and then to get Delphi as the main research method. Analyze and summarize the data collected through the literature drawing up a“Mandarin Writing Assessment Criteria For Junior High School Criteria”initial structure, and thus the preparation of the first round Delphi questionnaire; the implementation process through the Delphi method, in consultation with experts and scholars on the “Mandarin Writing Assessment Criteria For Junior High School Criteria”. The importance of the various dimensions of the project level evaluation and advice; and gradually seek consensus.
In the empirical analysis step, mainly "academic experts" and "teachers" "Writing teaching institutions," "Writing organizational Council" of 20 experts and scholars to study with the Delphi method. In the first round, the second level back to the importance of experts and advice to compile assessment results based on self second time, the third back to the “Mandarin Writing Assessment Criteria For Junior High School Criteria” for construction” of the questionnaire as a research tool. A total of 60 questionnaires sent, a return rate of 83%. The conclusions are as follows:
This study establishes the set of “Mandarin Writing Assessment Criteria For Junior High School Criteria”, is divided into four dimensions, 16 dimensions, 51 items. Writing is divided into four basic dimensions of knowledge, combined use of capacity, organizational structure, integration ability and writing ability. Dimension is divided into 16 punctuation marks, words, phrases, sentence context of the style, writing format, drawn and shows the rhetoric, levels and layout, creative thinking, critical thinking, emotional playing and writing style. Based on these results, the study of writing the final evaluation, respectively, teaching writing, content-based evaluation and recommendations for further study.
|
|---|
