On The Protection Of Experiment Animals In Taiwan From The Religious, Scientific, Ethical Perspectives Of Animal Welfare Theory

碩士 === 輔仁大學 === 宗教學系 === 100 === Abstract Animal ethics mainly discusses the problem of how mankind treats animals, which is related to the existence of moral position of animals and the discussion of animal interest value. Animal Welfare Theory is one of the descriptions of contemporary animal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wu, Jiachi, 吳家騏
Other Authors: 莊慶信教授
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2011
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/43990108954220327858
id ndltd-TW-099FJU00183013
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-099FJU001830132015-10-16T04:02:48Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/43990108954220327858 On The Protection Of Experiment Animals In Taiwan From The Religious, Scientific, Ethical Perspectives Of Animal Welfare Theory 由動物福利理論的宗教、科學,及倫理觀看台灣實驗動物保護 Wu, Jiachi 吳家騏 碩士 輔仁大學 宗教學系 100 Abstract Animal ethics mainly discusses the problem of how mankind treats animals, which is related to the existence of moral position of animals and the discussion of animal interest value. Animal Welfare Theory is one of the descriptions of contemporary animal ethics, which is approved by Taiwan and serves as the basic interest of protecting animals. Because “animal welfare theory” is originated from the West, the lack of understanding the history of how the westerners protected the animals and its real meaning caused the protection towards laboratory animals in Taiwan becomes unpractical. For this reason, this study traced back to the historical background and incident meaning of “Christianity”, “science”, “ethics”, and “animal experiment” in the West to explain the conception, meaning, and purpose of “welfare theory” on protecting laboratory animals. The essential contents of Animal Protection Act in Taiwan were cross-compared with the viewpoints of welfare theory. This study found that four problems were hidden in laboratory animal protection mechanism of Taiwan: First, the species and subjects protected by Animal Protection Act were significantly insufficient, and this Act was unable to manifest the essence of the five freedoms and the 3 Rs. Second, the ethics supervision mechanism of laboratory animals could not show its supervision and audit efficiency timely because of the defects of system design. Third, for the medical treatment, supervision, and euthanasia of the laboratory animals, veterinarian does not mandatorily need to participate, causing negligence when implementing the welfare. Fourth, the protection towards laboratory animals and companion animals during the implementation and punishment of administrative supervision showed significant difference. Last but not least, methods to improve the above-mentioned defects were proposed. Keywords: Animal Welfare , Animal Ethics, experimental animals , animal experimentation, The 3 Rs, The Five Freedoms. 莊慶信教授 2011 學位論文 ; thesis 182 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 輔仁大學 === 宗教學系 === 100 === Abstract Animal ethics mainly discusses the problem of how mankind treats animals, which is related to the existence of moral position of animals and the discussion of animal interest value. Animal Welfare Theory is one of the descriptions of contemporary animal ethics, which is approved by Taiwan and serves as the basic interest of protecting animals. Because “animal welfare theory” is originated from the West, the lack of understanding the history of how the westerners protected the animals and its real meaning caused the protection towards laboratory animals in Taiwan becomes unpractical. For this reason, this study traced back to the historical background and incident meaning of “Christianity”, “science”, “ethics”, and “animal experiment” in the West to explain the conception, meaning, and purpose of “welfare theory” on protecting laboratory animals. The essential contents of Animal Protection Act in Taiwan were cross-compared with the viewpoints of welfare theory. This study found that four problems were hidden in laboratory animal protection mechanism of Taiwan: First, the species and subjects protected by Animal Protection Act were significantly insufficient, and this Act was unable to manifest the essence of the five freedoms and the 3 Rs. Second, the ethics supervision mechanism of laboratory animals could not show its supervision and audit efficiency timely because of the defects of system design. Third, for the medical treatment, supervision, and euthanasia of the laboratory animals, veterinarian does not mandatorily need to participate, causing negligence when implementing the welfare. Fourth, the protection towards laboratory animals and companion animals during the implementation and punishment of administrative supervision showed significant difference. Last but not least, methods to improve the above-mentioned defects were proposed. Keywords: Animal Welfare , Animal Ethics, experimental animals , animal experimentation, The 3 Rs, The Five Freedoms.
author2 莊慶信教授
author_facet 莊慶信教授
Wu, Jiachi
吳家騏
author Wu, Jiachi
吳家騏
spellingShingle Wu, Jiachi
吳家騏
On The Protection Of Experiment Animals In Taiwan From The Religious, Scientific, Ethical Perspectives Of Animal Welfare Theory
author_sort Wu, Jiachi
title On The Protection Of Experiment Animals In Taiwan From The Religious, Scientific, Ethical Perspectives Of Animal Welfare Theory
title_short On The Protection Of Experiment Animals In Taiwan From The Religious, Scientific, Ethical Perspectives Of Animal Welfare Theory
title_full On The Protection Of Experiment Animals In Taiwan From The Religious, Scientific, Ethical Perspectives Of Animal Welfare Theory
title_fullStr On The Protection Of Experiment Animals In Taiwan From The Religious, Scientific, Ethical Perspectives Of Animal Welfare Theory
title_full_unstemmed On The Protection Of Experiment Animals In Taiwan From The Religious, Scientific, Ethical Perspectives Of Animal Welfare Theory
title_sort on the protection of experiment animals in taiwan from the religious, scientific, ethical perspectives of animal welfare theory
publishDate 2011
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/43990108954220327858
work_keys_str_mv AT wujiachi ontheprotectionofexperimentanimalsintaiwanfromthereligiousscientificethicalperspectivesofanimalwelfaretheory
AT wújiāqí ontheprotectionofexperimentanimalsintaiwanfromthereligiousscientificethicalperspectivesofanimalwelfaretheory
AT wujiachi yóudòngwùfúlìlǐlùndezōngjiàokēxuéjílúnlǐguānkàntáiwānshíyàndòngwùbǎohù
AT wújiāqí yóudòngwùfúlìlǐlùndezōngjiàokēxuéjílúnlǐguānkàntáiwānshíyàndòngwùbǎohù
_version_ 1718090432395608064