| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立交通大學 === 管理學院碩士在職專班科技管理組 === 99 === This research discusses innovation policies in renewable energy of the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan. Using Rothwell and Zegveld’s model of industrial innovation policy as a starting point, this research compares innovation policy across the two nations. Then, using the expert questionare and interview find out the Industrial Innovation Requirements and Policy Tools. Finally, comparing with both types of policy instruments, we have several suggestions for development of Taiwan’s renewable energy.
The results show that national preferences for innovation policy differ from renewable energy of different countries.China and Taiwan prefer to “Public Enterprise” and “Scientific and Technical”. What’s more, evaluating the Industrial Innovation Requirements and Policy Tools leads to a conclusion that the most critical categories of policy instruments are “Scientific and Technical”, “Education”, “Political”, “Public Enterprise”, “Taxation” and “Information”.
The work suggests that the government propose renewable energy roadmap, and the utility is responsible for planning and construction. Furthermore, the government should put more emphasis on the following policy instruments- “Scientific and Technical”, “Education”, “Political”, “Public Enterprise”, “Taxation” and “Information”. More specifically, the corresponding policy instruments in support of developing IIRs are provided in the conclusion of this thesis.
|
|---|
