| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立交通大學 === 管理學院科技管理學程 === 99 === The main purpose of this study, analysis of industrial innovation system, policy tools, and key success factors of relevance, and compared with the actual government policy in order to obtain the direction of future policy planning. The model structure is through policy analysis, and summarizes and classifies the twelve policy tools, the concept mainly Rothwell and Zegveld (1981) based on innovative policy instruments. And leverage expert questionnaire to identify elements corresponding to the needs of industrial innovation policy tools. Finally, the existing policies and industrial innovation policy tools to do the necessary analysis and comparison, to provide the advice to Taiwan to work out iEMS policy
According to these findings, the study found that the energy industry innovation policy tools in Taiwan tend to, in the "Policy measures" and "Finance" with higher proportion, and focus on environmental policy. In addition, iEMS Industrial Innovation policy begin with the required "Science and technology development", "information services", "Regulation and Control" and "policy strategy" and the relative importance of the four high.
By the comparison of these two policy tools found in Taiwan's current policy is lack of overseas contacts to promote the "Overseas" measures and industrial exchange of information, "Information Services." The future of Taiwan is expected to be towards the "Science and Technology Development", "Information Services", "Regulation and Control" and "Policy strategy".
|
|---|
