Default risk and equity returns:Evidence form Taiwan market

碩士 === 國立交通大學 === 管理科學系所 === 99 === Do high default risk firms earn higher returns than low default risk firms in Taiwan? Our paper examines the relation between default risk and equity returns controlled by size effect, book-to-market effect, and liquidity effect. In addition, we also examine if th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: 陳哲民
Other Authors: 李漢星
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: 2011
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/49111894069006633760
id ndltd-TW-099NCTU5457039
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-099NCTU54570392015-10-13T20:37:09Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/49111894069006633760 Default risk and equity returns:Evidence form Taiwan market 違約風險與權益報酬率:台灣市場實證分析 陳哲民 碩士 國立交通大學 管理科學系所 99 Do high default risk firms earn higher returns than low default risk firms in Taiwan? Our paper examines the relation between default risk and equity returns controlled by size effect, book-to-market effect, and liquidity effect. In addition, we also examine if there exists short-term return reversal phenomenon, and perform asset pricing test. Three models are applied to measure default risk: the Merton’s (1974) distance to default (DD) model, the Naïve Merton model (Bharath and Shumway 2008), and the Hazard model (Shumway 2001). The empirical results show that in Taiwan equity market, short-term return reversal of high default risk portfolio exists only for analysis of raw returns, but not for risk-adjusted returns. Our results also indicate that default risk alone has some power in explaining equity returns. However, default risk does not contain additional important price information uncorrelated to existing three or four risk factor models. 李漢星 林君信 2011 學位論文 ; thesis 69 en_US
collection NDLTD
language en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立交通大學 === 管理科學系所 === 99 === Do high default risk firms earn higher returns than low default risk firms in Taiwan? Our paper examines the relation between default risk and equity returns controlled by size effect, book-to-market effect, and liquidity effect. In addition, we also examine if there exists short-term return reversal phenomenon, and perform asset pricing test. Three models are applied to measure default risk: the Merton’s (1974) distance to default (DD) model, the Naïve Merton model (Bharath and Shumway 2008), and the Hazard model (Shumway 2001). The empirical results show that in Taiwan equity market, short-term return reversal of high default risk portfolio exists only for analysis of raw returns, but not for risk-adjusted returns. Our results also indicate that default risk alone has some power in explaining equity returns. However, default risk does not contain additional important price information uncorrelated to existing three or four risk factor models.
author2 李漢星
author_facet 李漢星
陳哲民
author 陳哲民
spellingShingle 陳哲民
Default risk and equity returns:Evidence form Taiwan market
author_sort 陳哲民
title Default risk and equity returns:Evidence form Taiwan market
title_short Default risk and equity returns:Evidence form Taiwan market
title_full Default risk and equity returns:Evidence form Taiwan market
title_fullStr Default risk and equity returns:Evidence form Taiwan market
title_full_unstemmed Default risk and equity returns:Evidence form Taiwan market
title_sort default risk and equity returns:evidence form taiwan market
publishDate 2011
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/49111894069006633760
work_keys_str_mv AT chénzhémín defaultriskandequityreturnsevidenceformtaiwanmarket
AT chénzhémín wéiyuēfēngxiǎnyǔquányìbàochóulǜtáiwānshìchǎngshízhèngfēnxī
_version_ 1718049616300081152