| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立臺灣科技大學 === 營建工程系 === 99 === Abstract
The level of public construction quality is an index for measuring the extent of national development of a country; it is also the benchmark for citizens to evaluate how the government is performing. People are especially sensitive to the quality of the medium and small-scaled people’s livelihood constructions since these constructions are most relevant to their daily life. For this reason, the Public Construction Commission, Executive Yuan has initiated a three-grade quality management scheme in order to establish an effective public construction quality management system, to supervise, correct and prevent quality control shortcomings. The Public Construction Commission, Executive Yuan promulgated “Construction Audit Sub-committee Operation Guidelines” on 2002 August 21 (revised on September 10 next year) to supersede the “Public Construction Quality Appraisal Important Notes” which was revised in 1999.
At present, the Public Construction Commission, Executive Yuan is focusing the emphasis of construction management on the contemplation of legal and procedural standards while public construction audit project selection is carried out mainly according to policy, media opinions and general statistics because a systematic audit project selection mechanism is still non existent. This study attempts to establish a clustering database for the central government and local county, city and township governments respectively using the construction management history database of the Public Construction Commission, Executive Yuan and inducts the factors that may affect the project quality to estimate the concealment audit evaluation scoring rules and patterns. Additionally, this study also attempts to use “Data Mining” as a tool to establish forecast results of which the ratings are set as follows: For central government - Grade A 96.05%, Grade B 91.91%; For local county and city governments: Grade A highest 86.46%, lowest 80.28%; Grade B highest 95.85%, lowest 92.59%; For township government: Grade A 80.13%, Grade B 98.51%. This study establishes models which can be used by the Audit Sub-Commission as a basis for carrying out an advance project selection so that resources can be used more effectively for necessary projects; the audit efficiency can be elevated; and most importantly, the people’s stereotype bad impression in regard to public construction quality can be expunged.
|
|---|
