Environmental Tax, Pollution Abatement Cooperation, and Social Welfare

碩士 === 國立高雄大學 === 經營管理研究所 === 99 === When the two firms emit pollutants simultaneously and the government levies environmental tax on the polluting firms. This article constructs a three-stage game model to investigate firms’ pollution abatement policies and the social welfare effects under the case...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wei Chen, 陳葳
Other Authors: Yu-Jen Cheng
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: 2011
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/01617186798781781451
id ndltd-TW-099NUK05457009
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-099NUK054570092015-10-13T20:23:02Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/01617186798781781451 Environmental Tax, Pollution Abatement Cooperation, and Social Welfare 環境稅、污染減量合作和社會福利 Wei Chen 陳葳 碩士 國立高雄大學 經營管理研究所 99 When the two firms emit pollutants simultaneously and the government levies environmental tax on the polluting firms. This article constructs a three-stage game model to investigate firms’ pollution abatement policies and the social welfare effects under the cases of non-cooperation and cooperation respectively. Main findings of this article are as follows: (1) Whether the firms are pollution abatement facilities cooperatively or not, the change of firm’s investment in pollution abatement facilities has an inverse relation with the change of the profits of the firms and pollution abatement ratios; The change of environmental tax has an inverse relationship with the change of profit and a positive relationship with pollution abatement ratio. (2) Regardless of whether firms use pollution abatement facilities cooperatively or not, the change of pollution abatement investment has positive relationship with the change of social welfare; The change of degree of environmental damage has inverse relationship with the change of social welfare. (3) Cooperative use of pollution abatement facilities by firms lead to higher level of pollution abatement ratio and more profit than those in non-cooperative case; Higher degree of pollution abatement facilities usage by firms, leading to increase in the difference between profits and pollution abatement ratios under cooperative use of pollution abatement facilities and non-cooperation; Higher the investment in pollution abatement facilities, then the difference between profits and pollution abatement ratios under cooperation and non-cooperation decreases. Yu-Jen Cheng 鄭育仁 2011 學位論文 ; thesis 54 en_US
collection NDLTD
language en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立高雄大學 === 經營管理研究所 === 99 === When the two firms emit pollutants simultaneously and the government levies environmental tax on the polluting firms. This article constructs a three-stage game model to investigate firms’ pollution abatement policies and the social welfare effects under the cases of non-cooperation and cooperation respectively. Main findings of this article are as follows: (1) Whether the firms are pollution abatement facilities cooperatively or not, the change of firm’s investment in pollution abatement facilities has an inverse relation with the change of the profits of the firms and pollution abatement ratios; The change of environmental tax has an inverse relationship with the change of profit and a positive relationship with pollution abatement ratio. (2) Regardless of whether firms use pollution abatement facilities cooperatively or not, the change of pollution abatement investment has positive relationship with the change of social welfare; The change of degree of environmental damage has inverse relationship with the change of social welfare. (3) Cooperative use of pollution abatement facilities by firms lead to higher level of pollution abatement ratio and more profit than those in non-cooperative case; Higher degree of pollution abatement facilities usage by firms, leading to increase in the difference between profits and pollution abatement ratios under cooperative use of pollution abatement facilities and non-cooperation; Higher the investment in pollution abatement facilities, then the difference between profits and pollution abatement ratios under cooperation and non-cooperation decreases.
author2 Yu-Jen Cheng
author_facet Yu-Jen Cheng
Wei Chen
陳葳
author Wei Chen
陳葳
spellingShingle Wei Chen
陳葳
Environmental Tax, Pollution Abatement Cooperation, and Social Welfare
author_sort Wei Chen
title Environmental Tax, Pollution Abatement Cooperation, and Social Welfare
title_short Environmental Tax, Pollution Abatement Cooperation, and Social Welfare
title_full Environmental Tax, Pollution Abatement Cooperation, and Social Welfare
title_fullStr Environmental Tax, Pollution Abatement Cooperation, and Social Welfare
title_full_unstemmed Environmental Tax, Pollution Abatement Cooperation, and Social Welfare
title_sort environmental tax, pollution abatement cooperation, and social welfare
publishDate 2011
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/01617186798781781451
work_keys_str_mv AT weichen environmentaltaxpollutionabatementcooperationandsocialwelfare
AT chénwēi environmentaltaxpollutionabatementcooperationandsocialwelfare
AT weichen huánjìngshuìwūrǎnjiǎnliànghézuòhéshèhuìfúlì
AT chénwēi huánjìngshuìwūrǎnjiǎnliànghézuòhéshèhuìfúlì
_version_ 1718047678005248000