The Factors Analysis of Advantage Strategy on Women's Volleyball Final Competitions in 2008 Beijing Olympic Games

• Main Authors: Fu,Ti-Hsiang, 傅狄祥
• Other Authors: Chen,Jia-Yean
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2011
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/44108751754470463330

碩士 === 中國文化大學 === 體育學系運動教練碩博士班 === 99 === 　　This thesis’ purpose is to analyze the Game Theory of 2008 Beijing Olympic Games Women’s Volleyball. The specific purpose of this study is: I. to comprehend that how players’ basic physical fitness & four term statistical data affect success & failure in Quarter-Final. II. To understand how players’ basic physical fitness affect scoring with different competitors. III. To know how different positions, types, frequencies, and competitors’ rhythm & frequencies of spiking affect scoring. IV. To find out how different types & frequencies of blocking & serving and how numbers of errors affect scoring. V. To find out how winner’s Game Theory connect to their advantages in Quarter-Final. In this thesis, we take 2008 Beijing Olympic Games Women’s Volleyball team of Quarter-Final as object of research to analyze how four terms of scoring skills affect scoring through Pearson Product-Moment Correlation & Chi-Square Test of Independence, and to find out the connection between winner teams’ advantages by Multiple Regression Analysis, discovered: I. According to different frequencies of spiking positions, ace spiker got most points as 154 times in Quarter-Final; in different types of spiking, the hard spiking got most scores as 96 times; in different types of blocking, double blocking got most scores as 41 times; in different types of serving, overhand floating service got most scores as 16 times; in different types of errors of competitors, errors of spiking lost most scores as 64 times. II. The height demonstrates positive correlation (p＜.05) with scoring of spiking, blocking, and serving, and reach significant difference. III. 1.The top four positions from different attacks harder to predict the ability to attack Scoring 1.7% more (p <.05). 2. The top four from different types of attacks harder to predict the ability to attack Scoring 5.6% more (p <.05). 3. Attack Scoring rhythm and attack shows negative correlation with the location and pattern of attacks shows a positive correlation p =. 000 have reached a significant difference. IV. 1.The top four from various forms of block is difficult to predict the capacity of sub-block gain and loss 0% (p <.05). 2. The top four from different types of less predictable serve Scoring ability to serve up to 0% (p <.05). 3. The gold medal fight in Brazil and the United States Failure to predict from the other pros and cons of different points of the capacity of 7.7% (p <.05); bronze war between China and Cuba, the number of different mistakes and the other is not between gains and losses associated with sub-existence; semi-finals Brazil and China different from each other between the turnovers and loss is not associated with sub-existence; semi-final the other mistakes the United States and Cuba, the number of different and not between gains and losses associated with sub-existence. V. Winning teams in the race strategy of the dominant nature of success factors and there are interactions between the contact relationship (p <.05), contact between the explanatory power of the fast (1.53)> whole (.53)> Variable ( .16)> high (-. 10). Volleyball essential relationship between the success factors, the first semi-finals of the competition "all" and "fast" dominated the game winner.