| Summary: | 博士 === 東海大學 === 社會工作學系 === 99 === A study on the implication of
the domestic violence perpetrators treatment
Hung Lin Hsieh
Abstract
The research of "A study on the implication of the domestic violence perpetrators treatment” is for the main purpose to understand the subjective cognition of the treatment of effectiveness by those who are in the intervention system of the domestic violence perpetrators treatment like the three sides of work staff, perpetrator and victim. That can be expected to enhance the sensitivity of the interpreted treatment of effectiveness, to increase the accountability level of treatment, and to build up a proper assessment model for domestic violence perpetrators treatment. The research visited 11 work staffs, 7 perpetrators, 6 victims, respectively discussed the work staffs’ implication of the treatment of effectiveness, the perpetrators perceived responses to the process, and the victims expectation for the perpetrators treatment to look forward to receiving the three degrees of similarities and differences direction. The research is by the qualitative research study with grounded theory analysis and theory construction, trying to understand the association of the treatment of effectiveness, and to construct the assessment theoretical model with diversity.
The research found that there were a number of implications in the assessment model of the treatment of effectiveness as follows:
First, the attitude of work staffs affected the treatment of effectiveness. When work staffs intervened with "type of equal partners " during the treatment, they were more likely to respect the clients self-determination, subject and object compatibility, close to the client, mutual learning, and to avoid replication of right & control and so on, all these made perpetrators have a higher acceptance to the treatment.
On the contrast, if work staffs intervened with the "type of professional authority" for the treatment, the intervention by the hierarchical relationship, professional point of view, political manipulation, and excessive use of authoritative influence, not only failed to improve perpetrators learning willingness, and even turn against the work staffs, the overall would consume the treatment of effectiveness.
Second, for the treatment of effectiveness, the action modes and the assessment system would be mutually positive reinforcement and weakened effectiveness.
(A) When work staffs were supported by the institution, the positive energy would increase, but when the institutional support was not good enough, it would result in business overloaded, hierarchical medical exploitation, the non-voluntary workers created, it would weaken the treatment of effectiveness.
(B) For perpetrators, due to non-voluntary client's property, dissatisfaction with the domestic violence system and the justice complaints, the treatment of effectiveness would be weakened. In addition, due to perpetrators self-change and their heterogeneity, etc., it would affect the assessment of treatment of effectiveness at the possibility of bias and mistakes.
(C) Justice system on the recidivism cognition of the treatment of effectiveness and the legal constraints of perpetrators, not only affected the effectiveness, but also interfered with the accuracy of the assessment.
(D) For victims, because of the problems arising from domestic violence and the trauma from battered experience, which would cause them to have the differences on the expectations of effectiveness, and they still lived with the perpetrators, and owing to the involvement of the judicial system, it was a tension condition. Both perpetrators and victims Implicated in such covariant relations, would sometimes weaken the effectiveness.
Third, the changed model for work staffs and the cognition distance of effectiveness for perpetrators.
The execution of the domestic violence treatment was directly or indirectly affected by the above systems, and would cause the distance differences between work staffs and perpetrators on the implication of effectiveness and the perceived responses. If the action modes of the systems were with positive energy, the cognition distance of effectiveness would gradually achieve consistency, but when systems weakened each other mutually, their cognition distance of effectiveness would gradually expand, and make the perpetrators with the attitude approaching profit and avoiding loss, half-hearted to the overall process of treatment.
According to the above findings, most importantly, work staffs should require their attitude to promote perpetrators motivation, not only to respect the will of perpetrator's self-determination, and to think all times by multiple positions to concern, and to avoid copying the sensitivity of paternity, and to adopt collaboration against professional intervention for perpetrators of domestic violence to proceed the treatment, but also need to consider the perpetrator's individual differences and needs and give perpetrators and victims opportunities to participate to design proper treatment programs to achieve accountability of the pragmatic requirements.
|
|---|
