| Summary: | 碩士 === 臺北市立教育大學 === 教育行政與評鑑研究所碩士班 === 99 === The purpose of this study was to formulation the master degree system for preparation of elementary schools in Taiwan.
This research was undertaken by Delphi technique. “Formulation of Master Degree System for Preparation of Elementary Schools in Taiwan Questionnaires” developed for 28-expert panel to contribute their perspectives with a three-round Delphi technique. Moreover, the date was analyzed by frequency distribution statistical method.
Based on the results, the conclusions are as follows：
1. Master degree system for teacher preparation of elementary schools should consider the institution, the trainee and trainee’ s qualifications, the teacher education model, the curriculum designs, the teaching practicum, the graduate assessment, and the supplementary measures.
2. Master degree system for teacher preparation of elementary schools should be conducted for five University of Education, and based on the college of education to responsible for academic research and master degree of preparation.
3. Teacher education model of master degree system should be implemented by “4+2” year.
4. Trainee’ s qualifications included finishing the credit points of education subjects, and meeting the grades standards. To selection students when one completed the credit points of education subjects. The selection way should contain the written assessment, an interview, application materials to be examined, and grades review.
5. At the master's phase should be emphasized that courses, included the basic teaching subjects, the education courses, the teaching materials and methods courses, the education research programs, and the teaching practicum.
6. The teaching practicum should be incorporated into the final year of teacher preparation. The graduate assessment could contain an interview, the written assessment, and a test demonstration of teaching.
7. The supplementary measures included strengthening the evaluation of teacher education, revising Teacher Education Act, setting up the professional competency standards and curriculum, providing government scholarships for master degree system students and establishing the elimination rules, letting the in-service teachers to gain master degree and changing the background of pre-service teachers, and building evaluation indicators for schools of practicum.
Finally, according to the conclusions of this study, there are some suggestions to present to the educational administration agencies, the institution of teacher education, and for advanced studies.
|
|---|
