The Evaluating Factors of The Best Favorable Bidding Supplier of Air Force Purchase

• Main Authors: Chao-Chin Li, 李朝欽
• Other Authors: 王維康
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2011
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/61555016652611719328

碩士 === 元智大學 === 經營管理碩士在職專班 === 99 === Because government procurement is huge in amount of money, influence economic activity and people''s trust and support of the government.It act quite important role in government''s budget expenditure, influence administrative quality more directly. The question that must face in the course of government procurement at present, the selecting trader is a quite important key factor, under reasonable budget, look for, honour an agreement the intersection of ability and best manufacturer, can pay taxes people money spend efficient and valuable. The system of award of bid of law of purchase of the government, did not only consider only with the price in the past.Its purpose lies in offering calling for bid to the unit to help to purchase the award of bid of one''s own characteristic way most. This research canvasses the government bodies and purchases in the business relevant suppliers evaluate the procedure, and use the analytic approach of level as building and constructing the method to evaluate criterion and weight of property purchasing case of kind-heartedness post of air force. Particularly, the purpose of this research is: Build and construct the kind-heartedness post property purchasing case of air force to evaluate criterion and weight the most favorably. The findings of this research are as follows: 1、Supplier’s performance, planning with financial managerial ability and service.（19.94％） 2、Supplier’s technological ability and real performance.（19.80％） 3、Supplier’s ability of manage in the building site and safety management.（14.89％） 4、Supplier’s products safety,technical specification and culture conservation.（13.24％） 5、Supplier’s Ability of human resources and operation management.（13.40％） 6、Supplier’s products quality and standardization.（18.73％）