The Responsive Evaluation of Social Type Multi-Employment Promotion Program- Viewpoints of Multiple Stakeholders

碩士 === 中華大學 === 行政管理學系碩士班 === 100 === “Social Type Multi-Employment Promotion Program”, an active employment policy is an innovative, local and developmental program presented by non-profit organization through a structure of cooperative partnership between non-profit organization and the government...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: YIN,CHIN-CHUAN, 殷錦娟
Other Authors: Chen-Kuo Shih
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2012
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/82377710082120454706
id ndltd-TW-100CHPI5149025
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-100CHPI51490252017-02-17T16:16:32Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/82377710082120454706 The Responsive Evaluation of Social Type Multi-Employment Promotion Program- Viewpoints of Multiple Stakeholders 多元就業開發社會型方案之回應性評估─多元利害關係人觀點 YIN,CHIN-CHUAN 殷錦娟 碩士 中華大學 行政管理學系碩士班 100 “Social Type Multi-Employment Promotion Program”, an active employment policy is an innovative, local and developmental program presented by non-profit organization through a structure of cooperative partnership between non-profit organization and the government, leading the disadvantaged to work in non-profit organization to create employment opportunities, cultivating the unemployed to have employabilities again for relieving their economic pressure, and requiring non-profit organization to maintain a certain percentage of employers after the end of subsidies for job opportunities of the unemployed. The program has been initiating for a decade since 2002. How the relevant policy stakeholders evaluate its performance effectiveness becomes a subjectof the study. This study based on responsive evaluation theory explores viewpoints of claims, concerns and issues responded from policy stakeholders, including policy makers, executive organizations and applicants etc. through research methods of literature review and in-depth interview for more understanding of this program. This study found that each policy stakeholder has difference in opinion and drop in awareness for understanding and interpretation about the content of “social type” multi-employment promotion program; the gap reflects several inadequacies on this program, including problems of insufficient incentive, shortage of funds for employing unit, employment years of employer insufficient for employability, failure of performance assessment by the government to employing unit and employer, and unavailability of promoting employer’s attitude and specialty in career. This study subject to the aforesaid problems provides some relevant policy suggestions. Regarding the government, we propose to (1) clarify “unemployment rate” and “unemployment” and set up correct policy goal; (2) establish withdraw mechanism for those withdrawals with poor effectivenesses; those at priority list with good effectiveness; (3) simplify the relevant operational process for such a policy; (4) integrate resources among government authorities; (5) establish a platform for the government, enterprise and multi-application unit; (6) increase selection of hired personnel for application unit; and (7) offer the relevant vocational training for employer. Regarding executive/operating unit, we propose to (1) establish and systematize guidance mechanism; (2) construct communication platform between employing unit and the government. Regarding employing unit, we propose to (1) train multi- human resource skills to increase employability; (2) arrange the relevant appropriate jobs for employers. Keywords: Social Type Multi-Employment Promotion Program, policy evaluation, responsive evaluation, policy stakeholder Chen-Kuo Shih 石振國 2012 學位論文 ; thesis 140 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 中華大學 === 行政管理學系碩士班 === 100 === “Social Type Multi-Employment Promotion Program”, an active employment policy is an innovative, local and developmental program presented by non-profit organization through a structure of cooperative partnership between non-profit organization and the government, leading the disadvantaged to work in non-profit organization to create employment opportunities, cultivating the unemployed to have employabilities again for relieving their economic pressure, and requiring non-profit organization to maintain a certain percentage of employers after the end of subsidies for job opportunities of the unemployed. The program has been initiating for a decade since 2002. How the relevant policy stakeholders evaluate its performance effectiveness becomes a subjectof the study. This study based on responsive evaluation theory explores viewpoints of claims, concerns and issues responded from policy stakeholders, including policy makers, executive organizations and applicants etc. through research methods of literature review and in-depth interview for more understanding of this program. This study found that each policy stakeholder has difference in opinion and drop in awareness for understanding and interpretation about the content of “social type” multi-employment promotion program; the gap reflects several inadequacies on this program, including problems of insufficient incentive, shortage of funds for employing unit, employment years of employer insufficient for employability, failure of performance assessment by the government to employing unit and employer, and unavailability of promoting employer’s attitude and specialty in career. This study subject to the aforesaid problems provides some relevant policy suggestions. Regarding the government, we propose to (1) clarify “unemployment rate” and “unemployment” and set up correct policy goal; (2) establish withdraw mechanism for those withdrawals with poor effectivenesses; those at priority list with good effectiveness; (3) simplify the relevant operational process for such a policy; (4) integrate resources among government authorities; (5) establish a platform for the government, enterprise and multi-application unit; (6) increase selection of hired personnel for application unit; and (7) offer the relevant vocational training for employer. Regarding executive/operating unit, we propose to (1) establish and systematize guidance mechanism; (2) construct communication platform between employing unit and the government. Regarding employing unit, we propose to (1) train multi- human resource skills to increase employability; (2) arrange the relevant appropriate jobs for employers. Keywords: Social Type Multi-Employment Promotion Program, policy evaluation, responsive evaluation, policy stakeholder
author2 Chen-Kuo Shih
author_facet Chen-Kuo Shih
YIN,CHIN-CHUAN
殷錦娟
author YIN,CHIN-CHUAN
殷錦娟
spellingShingle YIN,CHIN-CHUAN
殷錦娟
The Responsive Evaluation of Social Type Multi-Employment Promotion Program- Viewpoints of Multiple Stakeholders
author_sort YIN,CHIN-CHUAN
title The Responsive Evaluation of Social Type Multi-Employment Promotion Program- Viewpoints of Multiple Stakeholders
title_short The Responsive Evaluation of Social Type Multi-Employment Promotion Program- Viewpoints of Multiple Stakeholders
title_full The Responsive Evaluation of Social Type Multi-Employment Promotion Program- Viewpoints of Multiple Stakeholders
title_fullStr The Responsive Evaluation of Social Type Multi-Employment Promotion Program- Viewpoints of Multiple Stakeholders
title_full_unstemmed The Responsive Evaluation of Social Type Multi-Employment Promotion Program- Viewpoints of Multiple Stakeholders
title_sort responsive evaluation of social type multi-employment promotion program- viewpoints of multiple stakeholders
publishDate 2012
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/82377710082120454706
work_keys_str_mv AT yinchinchuan theresponsiveevaluationofsocialtypemultiemploymentpromotionprogramviewpointsofmultiplestakeholders
AT yīnjǐnjuān theresponsiveevaluationofsocialtypemultiemploymentpromotionprogramviewpointsofmultiplestakeholders
AT yinchinchuan duōyuánjiùyèkāifāshèhuìxíngfāngànzhīhuíyīngxìngpínggūduōyuánlìhàiguānxìrénguāndiǎn
AT yīnjǐnjuān duōyuánjiùyèkāifāshèhuìxíngfāngànzhīhuíyīngxìngpínggūduōyuánlìhàiguānxìrénguāndiǎn
AT yinchinchuan responsiveevaluationofsocialtypemultiemploymentpromotionprogramviewpointsofmultiplestakeholders
AT yīnjǐnjuān responsiveevaluationofsocialtypemultiemploymentpromotionprogramviewpointsofmultiplestakeholders
_version_ 1718414745784025088