| Summary: | 碩士 === 朝陽科技大學 === 社會工作系碩士班 === 100 === The purpose of the research is to explore the uses of synthetic assessment scales of domestic violence assailants. The reliability and validity of the applicability on these scales were analyzed. Domestic violence assailants were assessed by using fatal danger scale, the recidivism risk scale, and changeable assessment sacle through experience social workers in order to set up the tools for their follow-up treatment.
First of all, Delphi methods were conducted twice in order to test the expert validity. 16 experts responded the scales accordingly. Three new scales were then determined. 37 domestic violence assailants were tested by using fatal danger, the recidivism risk, and changeable assessment sacles through the experience social workers. The results of the research were stated as follows: The Cronbach''s α value of three scales were more than .80 and CR value between lowest 25% and highest 25% of most of items in three scales were different significantly, except the item 13 of the recidivism risk sacle and the item 2 and 8 in the changeable assessment sacle were no significant difference. In addition, while the total score of the fatal danger scale was the dependent variable, the item 6, 8, 9 and 12 entered into the regression model. It showed that these four items were the main factors that predicted the dependent variable. While the total score of the recidivism risk scale became the dependent variable, the item 9, 10, 13, 14, 20 and 22 entered into the regression model. It showed that these six items were the main factors that predicted the dependent variable. Moreover, the item 5, 6, and 7 entered into the regression model while the total score of the changeable scale became the dependent variable. It showed that these three items were the main factors that predicted the dependent variable. In practical assessment through social workers, three scales were proved to be effective to predict the possibilities of fatal danger and the recidivism risk. In conclusion, three scales may be adopted in the professional domestic violence assailant assessment. Some suggestions were proposed in the conclusion as well.
|
|---|
