教育機會均等性之探討第一代與非第一代大學生之比較

• Main Authors: LO HSIU TUNG, 羅秀東
• Other Authors: 林大森
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2012
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/74927040401330607627

碩士 === 佛光大學 === 社會學系 === 100 === Based on the concept of quality of educational opportunity, this study was aimed to explore how the family background and the academic achievement in general high school or vocational high school between the first-generation and non first-generation college students influenced them entering different universities, including the impacts of cultural, social and financial capitals on this issue. This study used quantitative method to analyze data. The sample was from the college freshmen in 2005, collected from “Taiwan Integrated Postsecondary Education Database” (N=48,478). There were six main findings. Firstly, 44.8 percent of the first-generation college students attended vocational high schools, while non first-generation college students chose to attend general high schools. Secondly, average grades in general high schools or vocational high schools of the first-generation college students were slightly higher than non first-generation college students. However, the first-generation college students' CEE(College Entrance Examination) grades and TTE(Testing for Technological and Vocational Education) grades were lower than non first-generation college students. Thirdly, about cultural capitals, non first-generation college students had better reading habits than the first-generation college students. Fourthly, about social capitals, the first-generation college students had fewer times to serve as leading cadres in clubs than non first-generation college students. Fifthly, about financial capitals, the first-generation college students took fewer courses, short of 1-2 subjects, in cram schools than non first-generation college students during their general high school or vocational high school years. Sixthly, about entering the different types of universities, the researcher used both binary logistic regression and multi-nominal logistic regression analysis and found the same result that non first-generation college students had greater opportunities to attend the comprehensive and public universities. It is hoped that the findings and conclusions of this study can contribute to the development of the recommendations for the practical application and direction of future research, and be used as the reference for academic institutions or government.