A Study of Leisure Motivation,Family Leisure Involvement and Leisure Benefit among Adolescents in Matsu

• Main Authors: Hsiao-Ching Chen, 陳曉菁
• Other Authors: Yen-Po Fang
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2012
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/84404699443605258589

碩士 === 銘傳大學 === 觀光事業學系碩士在職專班 === 100 === The purpose of this research is to investigate the current condition of leisure motivation, family leisure involvement and leisure benefit among adolescents. And investigate the differences of leisure motivation, family leisure involvement and leisure benefit among different backgrounds of adolescents. A modified questionnaire was employed. The subjects of the study were selected from five junior high school students and one senior high school students whose domiciles were registered in Matsu. In total, four hundred questionnaires were distributed, and four hundred questionnaires were returned. Four hundred questionnaires were complete and valid. Therefore, the response rate of valid questionnaires was 100%. The data was analyzed by using the descriptive statistics, t-test, one-way ANOVA and Scheffé analysis. The major findings were as follows:1.Among the adolescents’ leisure motivation, the “competence-proficiency” scored the highest, and in turn were intelligence development, social skills and exciting-escape. The most popular category of family leisure involvement among adolescents is “sense entertainment”, and in turn were social activities, sports and skills activities, knowledge and culture activities and outdoor recreation. 3.The most important leisure benefit for adolescents was “psychological benefit”, in turn were physical benefit and social benefit. 4. Under the different backgrounds, the leisure motivation among gender, grades, home location, householder character, and householder occupation had significant differences. 5. Under the different backgrounds, the family leisure involvement among gender, grades, home location, home condition, householder character, family monthly income and leisure expense were obviously different. 6. Under the different backgrounds, the leisure benefit between home location and householder character had significant differences. The results of this research present concrete suggestions to be used as the reference for leisure education improvement in the future.