| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立政治大學 === 科技管理研究所 === 100 === Domestic industry in Taiwan faces the oppounity of change and the core of growing industry recently will be knowledge based. Through carrying the spirit of entrepreneurship, the entrepreneurs equip abilities to compete in the tred of knowledge economy. Entrepreneurship education in campus leads the entrepreneurs and their team, with teached knowledge and skills from that, to reduce the“risk”in starting new business. Which means that those who experienced or well-educated will have the ability to improve the viability of new ventures.
Entrepreneurship education originated in Babson College and flourished in Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) makes a burst of craze in Taiwan. The development of the entrepreneurship competition in Taiwan came from the “Tic 100” hold by the Advantech Foundation in 1998. The entrepreneurship competition provides a platform for creativity and the spirit of entrepreneurship and nurtue the next generation entrepreneurial talents during the travel of realizing their dreams.
This study review and re-examine the development trace of the entrepreneurship competition in Taiwan based on the thory of the “Gatekeeping Mechanisms”and take the Top 3, include the “Tic 100”, the “We Win” and the”YEF”, as study cases.
Through this study we will realize how the organizers of entrepreneurship competition set the diffenent “Purpose of Gatekeeping Mechanisms”, which results in diffenet “Procedure of Gatekeeping Mechanisms” (includes the “Boundary Defination”, “Selection Mechanisms” and the “Content filtering”), as the implementation of the “Gatekeeping Mechanism” to attract players putting creative into it.Finally the implementation leads the entrepreneurship competition to result in the different “Achievements of Gatekeeping Mechanisms”, includes works, personnel and the brand management, and promote the development and the changes of the competition itself to pursuit perpetual operation through the “Freedback of the Participants (includes the players and the mechanisms)”.
The conclusions of this study can be summarized as below:
1. The “Purpose of gatekeeping mechanisms” in the entrepreneurship competition mainly includes the “Works Selection”, the “Personnel
Selection” and the “Of both”.
2. The “Purpose of Gatekeeping Mechanisms” in the entrepreneurship competition influences the design of “The Demarcation” in “Procedure of Gatekeeping Mechanisms”.
3. The “Purpose of gatekeeping mechanisms” in the entrepreneurship competition influences the design of “The Selection Mechanisms” in “Procedure of Gatekeeping Mechanisms”.
4. The design of the “Selection Mechanisms”, includes the open design and the multi-rendering form in “Procedure of Gatekeeping Mechanisms” in the entrepreneurship competition, has decisive influence for the “Achievements of Gatekeeping Mechanisms”. Finally, the participants (includes the players and the mechanisms) will gain better value-add consequent in this way.
5. The design of the “Selection Mechanisms” in “Procedure of Gatekeeping Mechanisms” in the entrepreneurship competition influenced by the differences of the “Purpose of gatekeeping mechanisms” and leads to different achievement.
6. Different Purpose of Gatekeeping Mechanisms in entrepreneurship competition, includes the “Works Selection” and the “Personnel Selection”, builds different design for the “Procedure of Gatekeeping Mechanisms” and results in the expected “Achievements of Gatekeeping Mechanisms”. However, influence from different purpose of gatekeeping mechanisms to the “Achievements of Gatekeeping Mechanisms” has no significant difference in long term.
7. The “Freedback of the Participants (includes the players and the mechanisms)” in the entrepreneurship competition influences the competition itself and leads the organizers of the competition rearrange the “Purpose of Gatekeeping Mechanisms” and the “Procedure of Gatekeeping Mechanisms”.
8. The selectioned issue from the participants in the entrepreneurship competition which has strong relatection to the hot topic in macroeconomics influences the “Achievements of Gatekeeping Mechanisms” and leads the development and transformation of the competition itself eventually.
|
|---|
