| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立東華大學 === 教育行政與管理學系 === 100 === This study aims to probe into the relation between the job characteristics, organizational justice, and job satisfaction of university staff. In light of that, a theoretical model was built up according to relevant literature as well as empirical research, incorporating different variables, such as backgrounds, job characteristics, organizational justice, job satisfaction, etc., distributing questionnaires to the staff of two universities in eaetern Taiwan (one national university and one private university), and analyzing as well as testing the data collected via several statistic methods, such as descriptive statistics, reliability test, factor analysis, multiple regression analysis, etc. This study has found:
1. In terms of job characteristics, the “Skill Variety” is most satisfying.
2. In terms of organizational justice, the “Fair Interaction” is most satisfying.
3. In terms of job satisfaction, the “Work Contribution” is most satisfying.
4. The impact of “Job Importance” of the “Job Characteristics” is significant upon “Work Achievement” of the “Job Satisfaction”.
5. The impact of “Fair Allocation” of the “Organizational Justice” is significant upon “Adminisation and Environment” of the “Job Satisfaction”.
6. The impact of “Fair Allocation” of the “Organizational Justice” is significant upon “Work Contribution” of the “Job Satisfaction”.
7. The impact of “Fair Allocation” of the “Organizational Justice” is significant upon “Work Itself” of the “Job Satisfaction”.
8. The better “Fair Allocation” the staff feel, the better “Fair Interaction”.
9. The better “Fair Allocation” the staff feel, the better the “Work Contribution”.
10. The lower the independence as well as completeness the staff feel, the lower the “Job Satisfaction”.
11. The higher “Job Importance” as well as “Fair Interaction” the staff feel, the higher the “Work Achievement”.
Concrete suggestions are given by this study based on the abovementioned finding as references for education administration authorities, university staff, and future studies.
|
|---|
