A Study of Implementation Effectiveness of Teacher Evaluation for Professional Development among Aboriginal Elementary Schools in Nanao Township of Ilan County

碩士 === 國立東華大學 === 教育行政與管理學系 === 100 === This study investigated implementation effectiveness of the Teacher Evaluation for Professional Development program among teachers in aboriginal elementary schools in Nanao Township, Ilan County, during the academic years of 2006~2011 and also examined dif...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chu-Sheng Lai, 賴主生
Other Authors: Shih-Hu Lin
Format: Others
Published: 2012
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/2h8p7v
Description
Summary:碩士 === 國立東華大學 === 教育行政與管理學系 === 100 === This study investigated implementation effectiveness of the Teacher Evaluation for Professional Development program among teachers in aboriginal elementary schools in Nanao Township, Ilan County, during the academic years of 2006~2011 and also examined differences across background variables. Data were collected from a survey administered to teachers who participated in the program and analyzed using methods including descriptive statistics, t-test, and one-way ANOVA. The results were as follows: 1. The teachers perceived high effectiveness in the “implementation” dimension of Teacher Evaluation for Professional Development, particularly in the subdimension of participation in promotional and training activities. 2. They perceived high effectiveness in the “evaluation” dimension of the program, particularly in the subdimension of professional spirit and attitude. 3. Their opinions with regard to the implementation dimension of the program did not significantly differ across “gender”, “age”, “highest education” or “duration of service”. 4. Their opinions with regard to the implementation dimension of the program significantly differed between “positions”. School principals perceived higher effectiveness in this dimension than homeroom teachers did. 5. Their opinions with regard to applications of the evaluation results significantly differed between different “durations of participating in the evaluation”. Generally, teachers who have participated in the evaluation for more than four years perceived better applications of the evaluation results. 6. Their opinions with regard to the evaluation dimension of the program did not significantly differ across “gender”, “age”, “highest education”, “duration of service” or “duration of participating in the evaluation”. 7. Their opinions with regard to the professional spirit and attitude toward the evaluation dimension of the program significantly differed between “positions”. School principals gave a higher rating to this subdimension than other groups.