Judicial Review of Environmental Impact Assessment: Level of Scrutiny and Criteria of Judgment
碩士 === 國立清華大學 === 科技法律研究所 === 100 === The judicial review issues, level of scrutiny and criteria of judgment, of environmental impact assessment (EIA) are discussed in this thesis. Chapter 2 introduces the controversy of the EIA system and execution in Taiwan. Chapter 3 discusses the conventional th...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
2012
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/17777502443793314910 |
id |
ndltd-TW-100NTHU5705014 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-100NTHU57050142015-10-13T21:23:06Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/17777502443793314910 Judicial Review of Environmental Impact Assessment: Level of Scrutiny and Criteria of Judgment 環境影響評估的司法審查:審查密度與判斷標準 Hsiao, Yu-Chun 蕭宇君 碩士 國立清華大學 科技法律研究所 100 The judicial review issues, level of scrutiny and criteria of judgment, of environmental impact assessment (EIA) are discussed in this thesis. Chapter 2 introduces the controversy of the EIA system and execution in Taiwan. Chapter 3 discusses the conventional theory of discretion and indefinite concepts of law, which are the main theories of judicial review of EIAs, and concluded that the level of scrutiny and the criteria of judgment used by courts in EIA cases in Taiwan were not consistent. In Chapter 4, the core idea is proposed that the decision of the level of scrutiny should consider every property involved, and the level of scrutiny should be strict in EIA judicial reviews due to the following factors involved: political malfunction, fulfillment of due process, intervention possibility of rights, and the long-term interests. On the other hand, referred to the American practice, some basic elements in criteria of judgment are suggested to be reviewed in EIA events: direct effect, indirect effect, cumulative effect, alternative, and mitigation measures. Also, courts should enforce the administrative agency to explain their review reason and should review the EIA decision strictly, especially on the conclusion of conditional approval. Chen, Chung-Lin 陳仲嶙 2012 學位論文 ; thesis 120 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 國立清華大學 === 科技法律研究所 === 100 === The judicial review issues, level of scrutiny and criteria of judgment, of environmental impact assessment (EIA) are discussed in this thesis. Chapter 2 introduces the controversy of the EIA system and execution in Taiwan. Chapter 3 discusses the conventional theory of discretion and indefinite concepts of law, which are the main theories of judicial review of EIAs, and concluded that the level of scrutiny and the criteria of judgment used by courts in EIA cases in Taiwan were not consistent. In Chapter 4, the core idea is proposed that the decision of the level of scrutiny should consider every property involved, and the level of scrutiny should be strict in EIA judicial reviews due to the following factors involved: political malfunction, fulfillment of due process, intervention possibility of rights, and the long-term interests. On the other hand, referred to the American practice, some basic elements in criteria of judgment are suggested to be reviewed in EIA events: direct effect, indirect effect, cumulative effect, alternative, and mitigation measures. Also, courts should enforce the administrative agency to explain their review reason and should review the EIA decision strictly, especially on the conclusion of conditional approval.
|
author2 |
Chen, Chung-Lin |
author_facet |
Chen, Chung-Lin Hsiao, Yu-Chun 蕭宇君 |
author |
Hsiao, Yu-Chun 蕭宇君 |
spellingShingle |
Hsiao, Yu-Chun 蕭宇君 Judicial Review of Environmental Impact Assessment: Level of Scrutiny and Criteria of Judgment |
author_sort |
Hsiao, Yu-Chun |
title |
Judicial Review of Environmental Impact Assessment: Level of Scrutiny and Criteria of Judgment |
title_short |
Judicial Review of Environmental Impact Assessment: Level of Scrutiny and Criteria of Judgment |
title_full |
Judicial Review of Environmental Impact Assessment: Level of Scrutiny and Criteria of Judgment |
title_fullStr |
Judicial Review of Environmental Impact Assessment: Level of Scrutiny and Criteria of Judgment |
title_full_unstemmed |
Judicial Review of Environmental Impact Assessment: Level of Scrutiny and Criteria of Judgment |
title_sort |
judicial review of environmental impact assessment: level of scrutiny and criteria of judgment |
publishDate |
2012 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/17777502443793314910 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hsiaoyuchun judicialreviewofenvironmentalimpactassessmentlevelofscrutinyandcriteriaofjudgment AT xiāoyǔjūn judicialreviewofenvironmentalimpactassessmentlevelofscrutinyandcriteriaofjudgment AT hsiaoyuchun huánjìngyǐngxiǎngpínggūdesīfǎshěncháshěnchámìdùyǔpànduànbiāozhǔn AT xiāoyǔjūn huánjìngyǐngxiǎngpínggūdesīfǎshěncháshěnchámìdùyǔpànduànbiāozhǔn |
_version_ |
1718062829987168256 |